Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005780›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Breastfeeding peer counselling for mothers of preterm neonates: protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sophie Laborie, Angelique Denis, Antje Horsch, Pauline Occelli, Jennifer Margier, Mathilde Morisod Harari, Olivier Claris, Sandrine Touzet, Celine Julie Fischer Fumeaux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03156946 (Breastfeeding Peer Counselling for Mothers of Preterm Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03156946 nacompletednot on this map

Breastfeeding Peer Counselling for Mothers of Preterm Neonates: a Stepped- Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2018 to 2022Enrolled1,774ConditionsInfant PrematureArmsbreastfeeding mother-to-mother support, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie LaborieHopital Femme Mère Enfant, Neonatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France sophie.laborie@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3257-6050
Angelique DenisService de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Pôle Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Antje HorschInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pauline OccelliPôle Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jennifer MargierPublic Health, University Hospital Centre Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-4228
Mathilde Morisod HarariChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
Olivier ClarisHopital Femme Mère Enfant, Neonatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Sandrine TouzetPôle Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Celine Julie Fischer FumeauxWoman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong preterm infants, mother's own milk feeding reduces neonatal morbidity and decreases the length of hospital stay. However, breastfeeding rates and duration are lower than among term infants. It is reported that peer counselling is effective in increasing breast feeding in term infants in low-income and middle-income countries, but results are mixed in high-income countries. We aim to investigate herein whether peer counselling may be a feasible and effective breastfeeding support among preterm infants in French-speaking high-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eight European centres will participate in this stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. We plan to include 2400 hospitalised neonates born before 35 gestational weeks. Each centre will begin with an observational period. Every 3 months, a randomised cluster (centre) will begin the interventional period with peer counsellors until the end of the study. The counsellors will be trained and supervised by the trained nurses. They will have a weekly contact with participating mothers, with a face-to-face meeting at least once every fortnight. During these meetings, peer counsellors will listen to mothers' concerns, share experiences and help the mother with their own knowledge of breast feeding. The main outcome is breastfeeding rate at 2 months corrected age. Secondary outcomes are breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge and at 6 months, breastfeeding duration and severe neonatal morbidity and mortality. The mental health of the mother, mother-infant bonding and infant behaviour will be assessed using self-report questionnaires. A neurodevelopmental follow-up, a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-consequence at 2 years corrected age will be performed among infants in a French subgroup. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: French, Belgian and Swiss ethics committees gave their agreement. Publications in peer-reviewed journals are planned on breast feeding, mental health and economic outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03156946.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAdultBreast FeedingCounselingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMothersMulticenter Studies as TopicPeer GroupRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreastfeedingnutritional supportpeer counselling

Identifiers

PMID32005780
PMCPMC7045006
OpenAlexW3003510900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.