Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005745›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2020

RNAconTest: comparing tools for noncoding RNA multiple sequence alignment based on structural consistency.

Erik S Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. mBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Evaluation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Bioinformatics Approaches in Noncoding RNAs Research.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Predicting RNA Structure Utilizing Attention from Pretrained Language Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erik S WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1457-4019

Funding

Uncovering synergistic antibiotic cocktails with comparative genomicsDP2AI145058 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WRIGHT, ERIK SCOTT · 2018 to 2018
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI145058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of noncoding RNA sequences has become increasingly clear over the past decade. New RNA families are often detected and analyzed using comparative methods based on multiple sequence alignments. Accordingly, a number of programs have been developed for aligning and deriving secondary structures from sets of RNA sequences. Yet, the best tools for these tasks remain unclear because existing benchmarks contain too few sequences belonging to only a small number of RNA families. RNAconTest (RNA consistency test) is a new benchmarking approach relying on the observation that secondary structure is often conserved across highly divergent RNA sequences from the same family. RNAconTest scores multiple sequence alignments based on the level of consistency among known secondary structures belonging to reference sequences in their output alignment. Similarly, consensus secondary structure predictions are scored according to their agreement with one or more known structures in a family. Comparing the performance of 10 popular alignment programs using RNAconTest revealed that DAFS, DECIPHER, LocARNA, and MAFFT created the most structurally consistent alignments. The best consensus secondary structure predictions were generated by DAFS and LocARNA (via RNAalifold). Many of the methods specific to noncoding RNAs exhibited poor scalability as the number or length of input sequences increased, and several programs displayed substantial declines in score as more sequences were aligned. Overall, RNAconTest provides a means of testing and improving tools for comparative RNA analysis, as well as highlighting the best available approaches. RNAconTest is available from the DECIPHER website (http://DECIPHER.codes/Downloads.html).

Indexed as

Sequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareAlgorithmsHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Untranslatedbenchmarkconsensus secondary structuremultiple sequence alignmentnoncoding RNAsecondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID32005745
PMCPMC7161358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.