Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005260›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2020

Mossy cell hypertrophy and synaptic changes in the hilus following mild diffuse traumatic brain injury in pigs.

Michael R Grovola, Nicholas Paleologos, Kathryn L Wofford, James P Harris, Kevin D Browne, Victoria Johnson, John E Duda, John A Wolf, D Kacy Cullen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A multiscale tissue assessment in a rat model of mild traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R GrovolaCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicholas PaleologosCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathryn L WoffordCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James P HarrisCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kevin D BrowneCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Victoria JohnsonCenter for Brain Injury & Repair, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 105E Hayden Hall/3320 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
John E DudaCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John A WolfCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
D Kacy CullenCenter for Neurotrauma, Neurodegeneration & Restoration, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. dkacy@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

BRIAN INJURY TRAINING GRANTT32NS043126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Douglas Hamilton Smith · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Network Dysfunction and Neuromodulation following TBIR01NS101108 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI John Allen Wolf · 2017 to 2026
$3.3M
Chronic Neurodegenerative Sequelae Driven by Neuroinflammation After Mild TBIR03NS116301 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CULLEN, DANIEL KACY · 2020 to 2020
$162k
Chronic neurodegenerative and neurophysiological sequela of closed-head TBII01RX001097 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DUDA, JOHN ERIC · 2015 to 2018
–
Neuromodulation as a Therapy for PTSD following Chronic TBII01RX002705 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI John Allen Wolf · 2018 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003748NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101108NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS-101108NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS116301NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS043126NINDS NIH HHS T32-NS043126RRD VA I01 RX001097RRD VA I01 RX002705RRD VA IK2 RX001479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEach year in the USA, over 2.4 million people experience mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can induce long-term neurological deficits. The dentate gyrus of the hippocampus is notably susceptible to damage following TBI, as hilar mossy cell changes in particular may contribute to post-TBI dysfunction. Moreover, microglial activation after TBI may play a role in hippocampal circuit and/or synaptic remodeling; however, the potential effects of chronic microglial changes are currently unknown. The objective of the current study was to assess neuropathological and neuroinflammatory changes in subregions of the dentate gyrus at acute to chronic time points following mild TBI using an established model of closed-head rotational acceleration induced TBI in pigs.

methodsThis study utilized archival tissue of pigs which were subjected to sham conditions or rapid head rotation in the coronal plane to generate mild TBI. A quantitative assessment of neuropathological changes in the hippocampus was performed via immunohistochemical labeling of whole coronal tissue sections at 3 days post-injury (DPI), 7 DPI, 30 DPI, and 1 year post-injury (YPI), with a focus on mossy cell atrophy and synaptic reorganization, in context with microglial alterations (e.g., density, proximity to mossy cells) in the dentate gyrus.

resultsThere were no changes in mossy cell density between sham and injured animals, indicating no frank loss of mossy cells at the mild injury level evaluated. However, we found significant mossy cell hypertrophy at 7 DPI and 30 DPI in anterior (> 16% increase in mean cell area at each time; p = <  0.001 each) and 30 DPI in posterior (8.3% increase; p = <  0.0001) hippocampus. We also found dramatic increases in synapsin staining around mossy cells at 7 DPI in both anterior (74.7% increase in synapsin labeling; p = <  0.0001) and posterior (82.7% increase; p = <  0.0001) hippocampus. Interestingly, these morphological and synaptic alterations correlated with a significant change in microglia in proximity to mossy cells at 7 DPI in anterior and at 30 DPI in the posterior hippocampus. For broader context, while we found that there were significant increases in microglia density in the granule cell layer at 30 DPI (anterior and posterior) and 1 YPI (posterior only) and in the molecular layer at 1 YPI (anterior only), we found no significant changes in overall microglial density in the hilus at any of the time points evaluated post-injury.

conclusionsThe alterations of mossy cell size and synaptic inputs paired with changes in microglia density around the cells demonstrate the susceptibility of hilar mossy cells after even mild TBI. This subtle hilar mossy cell pathology may play a role in aberrant hippocampal function post-TBI, although additional studies are needed to characterize potential physiological and cognitive alterations.

Indexed as

Cell SizeAnimalsBrain ConcussionDentate GyrusHead Injuries, ClosedMacrophage ActivationMaleMicrogliaMossy Fibers, HippocampalSwineSwine, MiniatureSynapsesSynapsinsSynapsinsConcussionHippocampusMicrogliaMild traumatic brain injuryMossy cell

Identifiers

PMID32005260
PMCPMC6993507
OpenAlexW3008111579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.