ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020
Using a 'rich picture' to facilitate systems thinking in research coproduction.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Participatory System Mapping of a Hospice Care System With Hospice Stakeholders: Hybrid Design Workshop Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Levers and constraints on general practitioners offering and managing reproductive genetic carrier screening in Australian primary care: a rich graphic of the complex context.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Power distance within student-teacher relationships: Let us talk about the rich pictures.Medical education · 2026Article
- Introducing "Visual bibliographies" as a novel tool for communicating complexity: a knowledge translation case study from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health care research.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Elusive boundaries: using an attribute framework to describe systems for population physical activity promotion.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Producing knowledge together: a participatory approach to synthesising research across a large-scale collaboration in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health.Health research policy and systems · 2024Review
- Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Adolescent social media use: cultivating and constraining competence.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Development of the Systems Thinking for Health Actions framework: a literature review and a case study.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Health System Transformation Playbook and Unified Care Model: an integrated design, systems & complexity thinking approach to health system transformation.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Barriers to participation in tourism linked respite care.Annals of tourism research · 2023Article
- Urban Regeneration Involving Communication between University Students and Residents: A Case Study on the Student Village Design Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Creating a Design Framework to Diagnose and Enhance Grassland Health under Pastoral Livestock Production Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Developing a Risk Reduction Support System for Health System in Iran: A Case Study in Blood Supply Chain Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Participatory codesign of patient involvement in a Learning Health System: How can data-driven care be patient-driven care?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Scale-up of prevention programmes: sustained state-wide use of programme delivery software is explained by normalised self-organised adoption and non-adoption.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Building a Prevention System: Infrastructure to Strengthen Health Promotion Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn coproduction research, traditional 'end-users' are involved in the entire research process. The aim is to facilitate research translation by improving the timeliness and relevance of research. Because end-users often come from multiple sectors and hold diverse perspectives and priorities, involving them in coproduction can be challenging. Tools and approaches are needed to support coproduction teams to successfully navigate divergent viewpoints while producing rigorous but meaningful research outcomes. Rich pictures are a systems thinking tool to help make sense of complexity. In this paper, we describe how we developed and applied a 'rich picture' in a coproduction project with policy-level partners.
methodsGuided by systems thinking principles, we conducted a systemic analysis of ethnographic fieldnotes collected as part of a broader study that examined the dynamics between an IT system and the implementation of the state-wide childhood obesity prevention programmes it was designed to monitor. Translating qualitative themes into metaphor and imagery, we created a visual depiction of the system to reflect the experience of the system's users (health promotion practitioners) and facilitated a workshop with policy-level programme administrators (i.e. participants, n = 7). Our aim was to increase the transparency of the system for our research partners and to spark new insights to improve the quality of programme implementation.
resultsGuided by provocative questions, participants discussed and challenged each other's thinking on the current functioning of the system. They identified future lines of inquiry to explore for quality improvement. Participants strongly agreed that the picture was a constructive way to engage with the ethnographic data but were challenged by the information and its implications. The opportunity for participants to co-learn from each other as well as from the picture was an added value.
conclusionIn the context of the facilitated workshop, the rich picture enabled research partners to engage with complex research findings and gain new insights. Its value was harnessed via the guided participatory process. This demonstrates the importance that, in the future, such tools should be accompanied by practices that enable participants to think with and apply systems thinking concepts and principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.