Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005226›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Implementation status of household contact tuberculosis screening by health extension workers: assessment findings from programme implementation in Tigray region, northern Ethiopia.

Hailay Gebretnsae, Brhane Gebrekidan Ayele, Tsegay Hadgu, Esayas Haregot, Aregay Gebremedhin, Eyassu Michael, Mebrahtu Abraha, Daniel G Datiko, Degue Jerene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Household- Versus Incentive-Based Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Rural South Africa: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hailay GebretnsaeTigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia. hailish14@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-8810
Brhane Gebrekidan AyeleTigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Tsegay HadguTigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Esayas HaregotTigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Aregay GebremedhinTigray Regional Health Bureau, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Eyassu MichaelUSAID/Challenge TB project, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Mebrahtu AbrahaUSAID/Challenge TB project, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Daniel G DatikoUSAID/Challenge TB project, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Degue JereneUSAID/Challenge TB project, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mekelle University · ETInternational Trachoma Initiative · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Tigray region of Ethiopia, Health Extension Workers (HEWs) conduct Tuberculosis (TB) screening for all household (HH) contacts. However, there is limited evidence on implementation status of HH contact TB screening by HEWs. The aim of this program assessment was to describe the implementation status and associated factors of HH contact TB screening by HEWs.

methodsThis programme assessment was conducted in three randomly selected districts from March to April 2018. Data was collected by using pre-tested structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was carried out using frequency tables. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with HH contacts screening by HEWs.

resultsIn this programme assessment a total of HHs of 411 index TB cases were included. One-fifth (21.7%) of index TB cases had at least one HH contact screened for TB by HEWs. Having TB treatment supporter (TTS) during intensive phase of index TB case (AOR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.06-6.01), health education on TB to HH contacts by HEWs (AOR = 4.28, 95% CI: 2.04-9.00), HH visit by HEWs within 6 months prior to the programme assessment (AOR = 5.84, 95% CI: 2.81-12.17) and discussions about TB activities by HEWs with Women Development Army (WDA) leaders (AOR = 9.51, 95% CI: 1.49-60.75) were significantly associated with household contact TB screening by HEWs.

conclusionsOur finding revealed that the proportion of HH contact TB screened by HEWs was low. Therefore, HEWs should routinely visit HHs of index TB cases and provide regular health education to improve contact screening practice. In addition, it is highly recommended to strengthen HEWs regular discussion about TB activities with WDA leaders and TB TTS.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersContact TracingFamily CharacteristicsAdultEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculosisEthiopiaHealth extension workerTigrayTuberculosisTuberculosis screening

Identifiers

PMID32005226
PMCPMC6995142
OpenAlexW3013660202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.