Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005137›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Ambulatory screening and decontamination to prevent Staphylococcus aureus complications in patients undergoing elective surgery (STAUfrei): study protocol for a controlled intervention study.

Antonia Bauer, Martin Grünewald, Hans Eberhardt, Rieke Schulz, Peter Martus, Bernd Brüggenjürgen, Stefanie Joos, Heidrun Sturm

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia BauerInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Faculty of Medicine of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Antonia.bauer@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-0879
Martin GrünewaldKlinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany.
Hans EberhardtKlinikum Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany.
Rieke SchulzPathways Public Health GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernd BrüggenjürgenSteinbeis Business Academy, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Faculty of Medicine of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Heidrun SturmInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Faculty of Medicine of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DESiloah St. Trudpert Klinikum · DESteinbeis University Berlin · DE

Funding

Innovationsausschuss beim Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss (G-BA) NVF1_2017-114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infections (SSI) are the most common health care associated infections in German acute hospitals and can result in prolonged hospital stays, increased use of antibiotics and utilisation of care. Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (methicillin-resistant S Aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S Aureus (MSSA)) are amongst the most prominent causes of SSI. While up to 90% of documented S Aureus colonization is already detectable prior to hospital admission, the majority of hygiene measures in Germany is focused on the hospital setting. It is hypothesized that early detection and decontamination of S Aureus colonization in primary care can prevent health care associated infections and reduce the number of S Aureus isolates in the hospital setting.

methodsThis study is a controlled interventional study (N = 13,260) with a pre-post comparison. The intersectoral intervention (over 2 years) will encompass the following elements: ambulatory detection and decontamination of MRSA and MSSA prior to elective surgery combined with a structured follow-up care. Patients from the control group will be screened in the hospital setting, in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) in routine care. The primary endpoint is the reduction of MRSA and MSSA colonization upon hospital admission. Secondary endpoints are complication rate (SSI), length of stay, recolonization of patients (3 and 6 months after release), patient and provider satisfaction, patient compliance and cost development. DISCUSSION: In case of positive results, the chance of a widespread uptake and implementation in routine care are considered high. The active involvement of primary care providers in the implementation of screening and decontamination as well as follow-up care is a unique feature of this study. The positive resonance of primary care providers during the recruitment phase highlights the relevance of the topic to the participating actors. These efforts are coupled with patient education and specifically trained medical staff, promising a sustained impact. The STAUfrei care pathway can homogenize current practices in routine care and provide a template for further intersectoral cooperation.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00016615. Registered on April 1st, 2019.

Indexed as

Controlled Clinical Trials as TopicCross InfectionDecontaminationElective Surgical ProceduresGermanyHumansInfection ControlMass ScreeningMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMonitoring, AmbulatoryStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSurgical Wound InfectionDecontaminationIntersectoral careMRSAMSSAPreventionStaphylococcus aureusSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID32005137
PMCPMC6995168
OpenAlexW3003499676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.