Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005134›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Dissecting the factors shaping fish skin microbiomes in a heterogeneous inland water system.

Yaron Krotman, Timur M Yergaliyev, Rivka Alexander Shani, Yosef Avrahami, Amir Szitenberg

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The gills and skin microbiota of five pelagic fish species from the Atlantic Ocean.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaron KrotmanIndependent Ichthyologist, Be'er Tuvia, Israel.
Timur M YergaliyevDead Sea and Arava Science Center, Dead Sea Branch, 8693500, Masada, Israel.
Rivka Alexander ShaniDead Sea and Arava Science Center, Dead Sea Branch, 8693500, Masada, Israel.
Yosef AvrahamiDead Sea and Arava Science Center, Dead Sea Branch, 8693500, Masada, Israel.
Amir SzitenbergDead Sea and Arava Science Center, Dead Sea Branch, 8693500, Masada, Israel. amir@adssc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7309-2845
Dead Sea and Arava Science Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFish skin microbiomes are rarely studied in inland water systems, in spite of their importance for fish health and ecology. This is mainly because fish species distribution often covaries with other biotic and abiotic factors, complicating the study design. We tackled this issue in the northern part of the Jordan River system, in which a few fish species geographically overlap, across steep gradients of water temperature and salinity.

resultsUsing 16S rRNA metabarcoding, we studied the water properties that shape the skin bacterial communities, and their interaction with fish taxonomy. To better characterise the indigenous skin community, we excluded bacteria that were equally abundant in the skin samples and in the water samples, from our analysis of the skin samples. With this in mind, we found alpha diversity of the skin communities to be stable across sites, but higher in benthic loaches, compared to other fish. Beta diversity was found to be different among sites and to weakly covary with the dissolved oxygen, when treated skin communities were considered. In contrast, water temperature and conductivity were strong factors explaining beta diversity in the untreated skin communities. Beta diversity differences between co-occurring fish species emerged only for the treated skin communities. Metagenomics predictions highlighted the microbiome functional implications of excluding the water community contamination from the fish skin communities. Finally, we found that human-induced eutrophication promotes dysbiosis of the fish skin community, with signatures relating to fish health.

conclusionsConsideration of the background water microbiome when studying fish skin microbiomes, across varying fish species and water properties, exposes patterns otherwise undetected and highlight among-fish-species differences. We suggest that sporadic nutrient pollution events, otherwise undetected, drive fish skin communities to dysbiosis. This finding is in line with a recent study, showing that biofilms capture sporadic pollution events, undetectable by interspersed water monitoring. Video abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDysbiosisEnvironmental PollutionFishesFresh WaterGenetic VariationMetagenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalinitySkinTemperatureRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA metabarcodingBiodiversityCutaneous mucusFishInland water systemMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32005134
PMCPMC6995075
OpenAlexW3013159328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.