Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005120›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Intersectionality, special populations, needs and suggestions: the Flint Women's study.

Maji Hailemariam, Julia W Felton, Kent Key, DeOnica Greer, Bernadel L Jefferson, Janice Muhammad, Raven Miller, Fallon Richie, DeWaun Robinson, Sharon Saddler and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119503 (Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06119503 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsBehavior, HealthArmsElongating Time HOrizons for Reentry (ETHoR), Standardized Episodic Thinking (SET)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maji HailemariamDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA. debenama@msu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-9637
Julia W FeltonDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Kent KeyDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
DeOnica GreerCommunity resident, Flint, MI, USA.
Bernadel L JeffersonCommunity Based Organization Partners, Flint, MI, USA.
Janice MuhammadCommunity Based Organization Partners, Flint, MI, USA.
Raven MillerDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Fallon RichieCombined-Integrated Clinical and Counseling Program, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
DeWaun RobinsonCommunity resident, Flint, MI, USA.
Sharon SaddlerCommunity Based Organization Partners, Flint, MI, USA.
Bryan SpencerCommunity resident, Flint, MI, USA.
Monicia SummersDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Jonne Mc Coy WhiteDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Jennifer E JohnsonDivision of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEquitable access to services that promote health and wellbeing is an important component of social justice. A community-engaged participatory qualitative study was conducted in Flint, Michigan, USA, to understand the needs of special populations (young women, perinatal women and new mothers, older women, women with disabilities, and LGBTQIA women) and elicit their ideas about solutions.

methodsIn-depth interviews (n = 100) were conducted. Participants were either women living in the Flint area, human service providers in the area, or both. A team of community and academic coders analyzed the data using an a priori framework.

resultsParticipants identified needs of different groups of women and suggested ways to address them. Access to healthy food, reducing healthcare costs, and improving transportation, job opportunities and affordable quality housing were crosscutting themes across all groups of women. Mentoring support was said to protect vulnerable young women from the risk of human trafficking. Older women were said to gain a sense of purpose, build their social support and reduce their loneliness by engaging in mentoring younger women. Women with disabilities were reported to benefit from infrastructure accessibility and authentic inclusion in all areas of life. Providing help that considers their dignity, pride and self-worth were suggested. LGBTQIA women were reported to have housing needs due to discrimination; mostly turned down as renters and can be rejected from faith-based homeless shelters. LGBTQIA women would also benefit from increased sensitivity among healthcare providers. For all groups of women, streamlining access to social services and other resources, building social support networks and increasing awareness about existing resources were recommended.

conclusionEfforts directed towards improving women's health and wellbeing should include perspectives and suggestions of diverse groups of women from the community. Acting on suggestions that emanate from the community's lived experiences may reduce inequalities in health and wellbeing.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeeds AssessmentWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansMichiganMiddle AgedPopulation GroupsPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32005120
PMCPMC6995063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.