ArticleBMC cancer2020
Simplified molecular classification of lung adenocarcinomas based on EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 mutations.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling heterogeneity in LUAD via multi-omics integration: molecular classification and therapeutic implications.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Actionable mutations and targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer among Latin American and Hispanic patients: a systematic literature review of prognosis and meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Probing the metabolic regulator and candidate tumor suppressor ALDH1L1 as a target for non-small cell lung cancer gene therapy.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Article
- Genetic feature selection algorithm as an efficient glioma grade classifier.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- BDNF is a prognostic biomarker involved in the immune infiltration of lung adenocarcinoma and associated with programmed cell death.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Research trends in microRNA profiling as a biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma via liquid biopsy: A bibliometric analysis.Narra J · 2025Review
- Efficacy and prognostic analysis of chemo-immunotherapy after TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with TP53 or KRAS co-mutations.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) Suppresses Arsenic (AsInternational journal of biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Inhaled Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles in Lung Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Host Transcriptional Regulatory Genes and Microbiome Networks Crosstalk through Immune Receptors Establishing Normal and Tumor Multiomics Metafirm of the Oral-Gut-Lung Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biological and Genetic Mechanisms of COPD, Its Diagnosis, Treatment, and Relationship with Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Prognostic impact of an integrative analysis of [EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Phase 1, pharmacogenomic, dose-expansion study of pegargiminase plus pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with ASS1-deficient non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene expression profiling has consistently identified three molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma that have prognostic implications. To facilitate stratification of patients with this disease into similar molecular subtypes, we developed and validated a simple, mutually exclusive classification.
methodsMutational status of EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 was used to define seven mutually exclusive molecular subtypes. A development cohort of 283 cytology specimens of lung adenocarcinoma was used to evaluate the associations between the proposed classification and clinicopathologic variables including demographic characteristics, smoking history, fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular results. For validation and prognostic assessment, 63 of the 283 cytology specimens with available survival data were combined with a separate cohort of 428 surgical pathology specimens of lung adenocarcinoma.
resultsThe proposed classification yielded significant associations between these molecular subtypes and clinical and prognostic features. We found better overall survival in patients who underwent surgery and had tumors enriched for EGFR mutations. Worse overall survival was associated with older age, stage IV disease, and tumors with co-mutations in KRAS and TP53. Interestingly, neither chemotherapy nor radiation therapy showed benefit to overall survival.
conclusionsThe mutational status of EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 can be used to easily classify lung adenocarcinoma patients into seven subtypes that show a relationship with prognosis, especially in patients who underwent surgery, and these subtypes are similar to classifications based on more complex genomic methods reported previously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.