Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005089›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2020

Considering gut microbiota in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Aneseh Adeshirlarijaney, Andrew T Gewirtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Association rule mining of the human gut microbiome.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aneseh AdeshirlarijaneyInstitute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University , Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew T GewirtzInstitute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University , Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

DECONSTRUCTING INFLAMMATION AND ALTERED MICROBIOTA IN METABOLIC SYNDROMER01DK099071 · NIDDK · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEWIRTZ, ANDREW T · 2013 to 2024
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) have revealed a role for gut microbiota dysbiosis in driving this disease. This suggests the possibility that approaches to restore a healthy host-microbiota relationship might be a means of ameliorating T2D. Indeed, recent studies indicate that many currently used treatments for T2D are reported to impact gut microbiota composition. Such changes in gut microbiota may mediate and/or reflect the efficacy of these interventions. This article outlines the rationale for considering the microbiota as a central determent of development of T2D and, moreover, reviews evidence that impacting microbiota might be germane to amelioration of T2D, both in terms of understanding mechanisms that mediate efficacy of exiting T2D therapies and in developing novel treatments for this disorder.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary FiberDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPlant PreparationsProbioticsDietary FiberHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPlant PreparationsDiabetesdietary fiberinflammationmicrobiota metformin

Identifiers

PMID32005089
PMCPMC7524291

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.