Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32005036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Does early palliative identification improve the use of palliative care services?

Nicole Mittmann, Ning Liu, Marnie MacKinnon, Soo Jin Seung, Nicole J Look Hong, Craig C Earle, Sharon Gradin, Saurabh Sati, Sandy Buchman, Ahmed Jakda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Equitable inclusion of patients with cancer on the palliative care register: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Clinician perspectives on delivering primary and specialty palliative care in community oncology practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicole MittmannCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-2316
Ning LiuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marnie MacKinnonCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Soo Jin SeungSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole J Look HongICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Craig C EarleICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon GradinCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saurabh SatiCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sandy BuchmanTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ahmed JakdaMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Frances C WrightOdette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether the early identification of patients who may benefit from palliative care impacts on the use of palliative, community and acute-based care services.

methodsBetween 2014 and 2017, physicians from eight sites were encouraged to systematically identify patients who were likely to die within one year and would were thought to benefit from early palliative care. Patients in the INTEGRATE Intervention Group were 1:1 matched to controls selected from provincial healthcare administrative data using propensity score-matching. The use of palliative care, community-based care services (home care, physician home visit, and outpatient opioid use) and acute care (emergency department, hospitalization) was each evaluated within one year after the date of identification. The hazard ratio (HR) in the Intervention Group was calculated for each outcome.

resultsOf the 1,185 patients in the Intervention Group, 951 (80.3%) used palliative care services during follow-up, compared to 739 (62.4%) among 1,185 patients in the Control Group [HR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.56 to 1.82)]. The Intervention Group also had higher proportions of patients who used home care [81.4% vs. 55.2%; HR 2.07 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.27)], had physician home visits [35.5% vs. 23.7%; HR 1.63 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.92)] or had increased outpatient opioid use [64.3% vs. 52.1%); HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.57]. The Intervention Group was also more likely to have a hospitalization that was not primarily focused on palliative care (1.42 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.58)) and an unplanned emergency department visit for non-palliative care purpose (1.47 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.64)).

conclusionPhysicians actively identifying patients who would benefit from palliative care resulted in increased use of palliative and community-based care services, but also increased use of acute care services.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedAgedCase-Control StudiesCommunity Health ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePatient Care TeamPrognosisSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID32005036
PMCPMC6994244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.