Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32004348›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of the CareStart™ glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) rapid diagnostic test in the field settings and assessment of perceived risk from primaquine at the community level in Cambodia.

Bertha Wojnarski, Chanthap Lon, Darapiseth Sea, Somethy Sok, Sabaithip Sriwichai, Soklyda Chann, Sohei Hom, Threechada Boonchan, Sokna Ly, Chandara Sok and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bertha WojnarskiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chanthap LonArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Darapiseth SeaArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somethy SokMinistry of National Defense, Department of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sabaithip SriwichaiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Soklyda ChannChenda Polyclinic (CPC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sohei HomNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Threechada BoonchanArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0926-0138
Sokna LyNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chandara SokNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Samon NouChenda Polyclinic (CPC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Pheaktra OungNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Nareth KongNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Vannak PheapMinistry of National Defense, Department of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Khengheang ThayNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Vy DaoMinistry of National Defense, Department of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Worachet KuntawunginnArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mitra FeldmanArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0193-0416
Panita GosiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nillawan BuathongArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mali IttiverakulArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nichapat UthaimongkolArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rekol HuyNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Michele SpringArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dysoley LekNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Philip SmithArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mark M FukudaArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mariusz WojnarskiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-6385
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THCambodia National Malaria Center · KHGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimaquine is an approved radical cure treatment for Plasmodium vivax malaria but treatment can result in life-threatening hemolysis if given to a glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient (G6PDd) patient. There is a need for reliable point-of-care G6PD diagnostic tests.

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of the CareStart™ rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) and village malaria workers (VMWs) in field settings, and to better understand user perceptions about the risks and benefits of PQ treatment guided by RDT results.

methodsThis study enrolled 105 HCWs and VMWs, herein referred to as trainees, who tested 1,543 healthy adult male volunteers from 84 villages in Cambodia. The trainees were instructed on G6PD screening, primaquine case management, and completed pre and post-training questionnaires. Each trainee tested up to 16 volunteers in the field under observation by the study staff.

resultsOut of 1,542 evaluable G6PD volunteers, 251 (16.28%) had quantitative enzymatic activity less than 30% of an adjusted male median (8.30 U/g Hb). There was no significant difference in test sensitivity in detecting G6PDd between trainees (97.21%), expert study staff in the field (98.01%), and in a laboratory setting (95.62%) (p = 0.229); however, test specificity was different for trainees (96.62%), expert study staff in the field (98.14%), and experts in the laboratory (98.99%) (p < 0.001). Negative predictive values were not statistically different for trainees, expert staff, and laboratory testing: 99.44%, 99.61%, and 99.15%, respectively. Knowledge scores increased significantly post-training, with 98.7% willing to prescribe primaquine for P.vivax malaria, an improvement from 40.6% pre-training (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis study demonstrated ability of medical staff with different background to accurately use CareStart™ RDT to identify G6PDd in male patients, which may enable safer prescribing of primaquine; however, pharmacovigilance is required to address possible G6PDd misclassifications.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineResidence CharacteristicsAdultCambodiaFemaleGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansMalaria, VivaxMalePoint-of-Care SystemsPrimaquineRisk AssessmentYoung AdultGlucosephosphate DehydrogenasePrimaquine

Identifiers

PMID32004348
PMCPMC6994100
OpenAlexW3003877091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.