Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32004342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Community-intrinsic properties enhance keratin degradation from bacterial consortia.

Poonam Nasipuri, Jakob Herschend, Asker D Brejnrod, Jonas S Madsen, Roall Espersen, Birte Svensson, Mette Burmølle, Samuel Jacquiod, Søren J Sørensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Microbial model communities: To understand complexity, harness the power of simplicity.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Poonam NasipuriSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jakob HerschendSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Asker D BrejnrodNovo Nordic Foundation Center For Basic Metabolic Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jonas S MadsenSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Roall EspersenDTU Bioengineering, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Birte SvenssonDTU Bioengineering, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Mette BurmølleSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Samuel JacquiodSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren J SørensenSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-9906
University of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKNovo Nordisk Foundation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although organic matter may accumulate sometimes (e.g. lignocellulose in peat bog), most natural biodegradation processes are completed until full mineralization. Such transformations are often achieved by the concerted action of communities of interacting microbes, involving different species each performing specific tasks. These interactions can give rise to novel "community-intrinsic" properties, through e.g. activation of so-called "silent genetic pathways" or synergistic interplay between microbial activities and functions. Here we studied the microbial community-based degradation of keratin, a recalcitrant biological material, by four soil isolates, which have previously been shown to display synergistic interactions during biofilm formation; Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, Xanthomonas retroflexus, Microbacterium oxydans and Paenibacillus amylolyticus. We observed enhanced keratin weight loss in cultures with X. retroflexus, both in dual and four-species co-cultures, as compared to expected keratin degradation by X. retroflexus alone. Additional community intrinsic properties included accelerated keratin degradation rates and increased biofilm formation on keratin particles. Comparison of secretome profiles of X. retroflexus mono-cultures to co-cultures revealed that certain proteases (e.g. serine protease S08) were significantly more abundant in mono-cultures, whereas co-cultures had an increased abundance of proteins related to maintaining the redox environment, e.g. glutathione peroxidase. Hence, one of the mechanisms related to the community intrinsic properties, leading to enhanced degradation from co-cultures, might be related to a switch from sulfitolytic to proteolytic functions between mono- and co-cultures, respectively.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiofilmsCoculture TechniquesKeratinsMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobial InteractionsSoil MicrobiologyKeratins

Identifiers

PMID32004342
PMCPMC6994199
OpenAlexW3003325636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.