Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32004331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a Mobile Health Wallet for pregnancy-related health care: A qualitative study of stakeholders' perceptions in Madagascar.

Nadine Muller, Shannon A McMahon, Jan-Walter De Neve, Alexej Funke, Till Bärnighausen, Elsa N Rajemison, Etienne Lacroze, Julius V Emmrich, Samuel Knauss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mobile money and households' ability to respond to health shocks in Africa: Evidence from Madagascar.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nadine MullerMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-9716
Shannon A McMahonMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan-Walter De NeveMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0090-8249
Alexej FunkeMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Till BärnighausenMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elsa N RajemisonMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Etienne LacrozeMedical Faculty, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julius V EmmrichCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Samuel KnaussCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial barriers are a major obstacle to accessing maternal health care services in low-resource settings. In Madagascar, less than half of live births are attended by skilled health staff. Although mobile money-based savings and payment systems are often used to pay for a variety of services, including health care, data on the implications of a dedicated mobile money wallet restricted to health-related spending during pregnancy-a mobile health wallet (MHW)-are not well understood. In cooperation with the Madagascan Ministry of Health, this study aims to elicit the perceptions, experiences, and recommendations of key stakeholders in relation to a MHW amid a pilot study in 31 state-funded health care facilities. We conducted a two-stage qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews with stakeholders (N = 21) representing the following groups: community representatives, health care providers, health officials and representatives from phone provider companies. Interviews were conducted in Atsimondrano and Renivohitra districts, between November and December of 2017. Data was coded thematically using inductive and deductive approaches, and found to align with a social ecological model. Key facilitators for successful implementation of the MHW, include (i) close collaboration with existing communal structures and (ii) creation of an incentive scheme to reward pregnant women to save. Key barriers to the application of the MHW in the study zone include (i) disruption of informal benefits for health care providers related to the current cash-based payment system, (ii) low mobile phone ownership, (iii) illiteracy among the target population, and (iv) failure of the MHW to overcome essential access barriers towards institutional health care services such as fear of unpredictable expenses. The MHW was perceived as a potential solution to reduce disparities in access to maternal health care. To ensure success of the MHW, direct demand-side and provider-side financial incentives merit consideration.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneHealth Services AccessibilityMaternal Health ServicesTelemedicineAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMadagascarMotivationPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID32004331
PMCPMC6993972
OpenAlexW3004317783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.