Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32004235›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2020

Geographic Differences in Population Health and Expected Organ Supply in the Gulf Coast Region of the United States Compared to Non-Gulf States.

Rhiannon D Reed, Brittany A Shelton, Margaux N Mustian, Paul A MacLennan, Deirdre Sawinski, Jayme E Locke

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhiannon D ReedDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Brittany A SheltonDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Margaux N MustianDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Paul A MacLennanDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Deirdre SawinskiDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jayme E LockeDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Research CoreU54MD008602 · NIMHD · BAYOUCLINIC, INC. · PI SCARINCI, ISABEL C · 2013 to 2017
$13.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Final Rule aimed to reduce geographic disparities in access to transplantation by prioritizing the need for transplant over donor proximity. However, disparities in waiting times persist for deceased donor kidney transplantation. The kidney allocation system implemented in 2014 does not account for potential local supply based on population health characteristics within a donation service area (DSA). We hypothesized that regions with traditionally high rates of comorbid disease, such as the states located along the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf States), may be disadvantaged by limited local supply secondary to poor population health.

methodsUsing data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings, the United States Renal Data System, and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we compared population-level characteristics and expected kidney donation rates by Gulf States location.

resultsPrevalence of African American ethnicity, end-stage renal disease, diabetes, fair/poor self-rated health, physical inactivity, food insecurity, and uninsurance were higher among Gulf State DSAs. On unadjusted analyses, Gulf State DSAs were associated with 3.52 fewer expected kidney donors per 100 eligible deaths than non-Gulf States. After adjustment, there was no longer a statistically significant difference in expected kidney donation rate.

conclusionsAlthough Gulf State DSAs have lower expected donation rates, these differences appear to be driven by the prevalence of health factors negatively associated with donation rate. These data suggest the need to discuss population health characteristics when examining kidney allocation policy, to account for potential lower supply of donors and to further address geographic disparities in access to kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesPopulation HealthRegistriesAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsUnited StatesWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID32004235
PMCPMC7000133
OpenAlexW2951728769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.