ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Prognostic significance of the renal resistive index in the primary prevention of type II diabetes.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular risk and renal injury profile in subjects with type 2 diabetes and non-albuminuric diabetic kidney disease.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Favorable effect of renal denervation on elevated renal vascular resistance in patients with resistant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Renal resistive index: Beyond the hemodynamics.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Prognostic significance of the renal resistive index in the primary prevention of type II diabetes.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Subtle morpho-functional kidney changes in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: A duplex ultrasound assessment.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The renal resistive index has been demonstrated to predict the progression of renal disease and recurrence of major cardiac events in high-risk cardiovascular patients, in addition to other comorbidities. We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of the renal resistive index in type 2 diabetic patients for primary prevention. From 2008 to 2011, patients with type 2 diabetes underwent cardiovascular evaluation, including renal resistive index assessment by renal Doppler ultrasound. The incidence of all-cause death, cardiovascular events, dialysis requirement or a twofold increase in creatinine was recorded. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Two hundred sixty-six patients were included; 50% of the patients were men, an HbA1C level of 8.1 ± 1.7% (65 ± 13.6 mmol/mol) and a serum creatinine level of 8 [7-9] mg/L. The mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure, 24-hour diastolic blood pressure, and 24-hour pulse pressure were 133.4 ± 16.7, 76.5 ± 9.4, and 56.9 ± 12.4 mm Hg, respectively. The median renal resistive index was 0.7 [0.6-0.7] with a threshold of 0.7 predictive of monitored events. After adjustment of the 24-hour pulse pressure, age and 24-hour heart rate, a renal resistive index ≥0.70 remained associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio: 3.23 (1.16-8.98); P = .025) and the composite endpoint of major clinical events (hazard ratio: 2.37 (1.34-4.18); P = .003). An elevated renal resistive index with a threshold of 0.7 is an independent predictor of a first cardiovascular or renal event in type 2 diabetic patients. This simple index should be implemented in the multiparametric staging of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.