ArticleJAMA network open2020
Evaluation of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy Newborn Screening in North Carolina.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attitudes Toward Sex-Specific Versus Universal Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Hong Kong.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Adrenoleukodystrophy in adults: phenotypic characterisation and natural history in a large cohort.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Observational
- The Grey Zone Project: Risk-Based Classification of ABCD1 Variants in X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Newborn Screening of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Italy: Clinical and Biochemical Outcomes from a 4-Year Pilot Study.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Optimization of the Performance of Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy by Flow Injection Analysis Tandem Mass Spectrometry.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Gene Therapy of Adrenomyeloneuropathy: Challenges, Target Cells, and Prospectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
- Newborn screening and rapid genomic diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Review
- In vivo adenine base editing rescues adrenoleukodystrophy in a humanized mouse model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Approaches to diagnosis for individuals with a suspected inherited white matter disorder.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2024Review
- [Adrenal insufficiency as part of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy].Problemy endokrinologii · 2023Observational
- Diagnosing X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy after Implementation of Newborn Screening: A Reference Laboratory Perspective.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Early Detection of Adrenal Insufficiency: The Impact of Newborn Screening for Adrenoleukodystrophy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Article
- Attitudes of Patients with Adrenoleukodystrophy towards Sex-Specific Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Multivariate analysis and model building for classifying patients in the peroxisomal disorders X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy and Zellweger syndrome in Chinese pediatric patients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Neurocognitive and mental health impact of adrenoleukodystrophy across the lifespan: Insights for the era of newborn screening.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2023Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of the NeoBase 2 Non-derivatized MSMS Assay and Exploration of Analytes With Significantly Different Concentrations Between Term and Preterm Neonates.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Self-reported quality of life in symptomatic and asymptomatic women with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Sex-specific newborn screening for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a peroxisomal genetic disorder in which an accumulation of very long-chain fatty acids leads to inflammatory demyelination in the central nervous system and to adrenal cortex atrophy. In 2016, X-ALD was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a single-tier newborn screening assay for X-ALD in North Carolina. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic screening study was of all newborn dried blood spot specimens received in the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health between January 2 and June 1, 2018, excluding specimens of insufficient quantity or quality. A total of 52 301 specimens were screened for X-ALD using negative ionization high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to measure C24:0- and C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine concentrations. Sanger sequencing of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily D member 1 (ABCD1) gene was performed on screen-positive specimens. Exposures: A medical and family history, newborn physical examination, sequencing of ABCD1 on dried blood spot samples, and plasma analysis of very long-chain fatty acids were obtained for all infants with screen-positive results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of X-ALD in North Carolina and the positive predictive value and false-positive rate for the first-tier assay were determined. Results: Of 52 301 infants tested (47.8% female, 50.6% male, and 1.7% other or unknown sex), 12 received screen-positive results. Of these 12 infants, 8 were confirmed with a genetic disorder: 3 male infants with X-ALD, 3 X-ALD-heterozygous female infants, 1 female infant with a peroxisome biogenesis disorder, and 1 female infant with Aicardi-Goutières syndrome. Four infants were initially classified as having false-positives results, including 3 female infants who were deemed unaffected and 1 male infant with indeterminate results on confirmatory testing. The positive predictive value for X-ALD or other genetic disorders for the first-tier assay was 67%, with a false-positive rate of 0.0057%. Conclusions and Relevance: This newborn screening pilot study reported results on 2 lysophosphatidylcholine analytes, identifying 3 male infants with X-ALD, 3 X-ALD-heterozygous female infants, and 3 infants with other disorders associated with increased very long-chain fatty acids. These results showed successful implementation in a public health program with minimal risk to the population. The findings will support other state laboratories planning to implement newborn screening for X-ALD and related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.