Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32003768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2020

Cortical contraction drives the 3D patterning of epithelial cell surfaces.

Aaron P van Loon, Ivan S Erofeev, Ivan V Maryshev, Andrew B Goryachev, Alvaro Sagasti

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. mTOR signaling governs the formation of epithelial apical projections via S6K1-RhoA and aPKC-Lgl2 axes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron P van LoonDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Ivan S ErofeevCentre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ivan V MaryshevCentre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew B GoryachevCentre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alvaro SagastiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA NIGMS T32 Program AssessmentT32GM007185 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TORRES, JORGE · 1985 to 2020
$21.7M
Cytoskeletal Control of Microridge Morphogenesis on Mucosal Epithelial Cells of the Zebrafish SkinR01GM122901 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAGASTI, ALVARO · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
The morphogenesis of actin-based structures in mucosal epitheliaR21EY024400 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAGASTI, ALVARO · 2014 to 2015
$404k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P006507Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P01190XNEI NIH HHS R21 EY024400NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122901NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular protrusions create complex cell surface topographies, but biomechanical mechanisms regulating their formation and arrangement are largely unknown. To study how protrusions form, we focused on the morphogenesis of microridges, elongated actin-based structures that are arranged in maze-like patterns on the apical surfaces of zebrafish skin cells. Microridges form by accreting simple finger-like precursors. Live imaging demonstrated that microridge morphogenesis is linked to apical constriction. A nonmuscle myosin II (NMII) reporter revealed pulsatile contractions of the actomyosin cortex, and inhibiting NMII blocked apical constriction and microridge formation. A biomechanical model suggested that contraction reduces surface tension to permit the fusion of precursors into microridges. Indeed, reducing surface tension with hyperosmolar media promoted microridge formation. In anisotropically stretched cells, microridges formed by precursor fusion along the stretch axis, which computational modeling explained as a consequence of stretch-induced cortical flow. Collectively, our results demonstrate how contraction within the 2D plane of the cortex can pattern 3D cell surfaces.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActomyosinAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBiomechanical PhenomenaCell Surface ExtensionsEpithelial CellsMorphogenesisMyosin Type IISkinSurface TensionTime FactorsZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsActomyosinMyosin Type IIZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32003768
PMCPMC7054995
OpenAlexW3003831993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.