Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32003695›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2020

The Ambiguous Role of Microglia in Aβ Toxicity: Chances for Therapeutic Intervention.

Sara Merlo, Simona Federica Spampinato, Grazia Ilaria Caruso, Maria Angela Sortino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara MerloDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology; University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Simona Federica SpampinatoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology; University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Grazia Ilaria CarusoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology; University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Maria Angela SortinoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology; University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid-β (Aβ) has long been shown to be critical in Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. Microglia contributes to the earliest responses to Aβ buildup, by direct interaction through multiple receptors. Microglial cells operate Aβ clearance and trigger inflammatory/regenerative processes that take place in the long years of silent disease progression that precede symptomatic appearance. But in time and with aging, the fine balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory activity of microglia deranges, negatively impacting its Aβ-clearing ability. Furthermore, in recent years, microglial activation has proven to be much more complex than the mere dichotomic pro/antiinflammatory polarization previously accepted. Microglia can display a wide spectrum of phenotypes, which can even be mixed. On these bases, it is evident that while pharmacological intervention aiding microglia to prolong its ability to cope with Aβ buildup could be extremely relevant, its feasibility is hampered by such high complexity, which still needs to be completely understood.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBrainEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMicrogliaNeuronsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer's diseaseCD33microglial activationneuroinflammationTREM2β-amyloid receptors.

Identifiers

PMID32003695
PMCPMC7457435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.