Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32003694›Full record

ArticleCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2020

Neurocognitive and Psychiatric Markers for Addiction: Common vs. Specific Endophenotypes for Heroin and Amphetamine Dependence.

Elizabeth C Long, Radka Kaneva, Georgi Vasilev, F Gerard Moeller, Jasmin Vassileva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Repeated Cocaine Intake Differentially Impacts Striatal DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impulsivities and addictions: a multidimensional integrative framework informing assessment and interventions for substance use disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth C LongEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania PA, United States.
Radka KanevaDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Sofia Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Georgi VasilevBulgarian Addictions Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria.
F Gerard MoellerInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Jasmin VassilevaInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USMedical University of Sofia · BGPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
Varieties of Impulsivity in Opiate and Stimulant UsersR01DA021421 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VASSILEVA, JASMIN L · 2008 to 2025
$6.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe differential utility of neurocognitive impulsivity and externalizing/ internalizing traits as putative endophenotypes for dependence on heroin vs. amphetamine is unclear.

objectiveThis exploratory study aims to determine: (1) whether neurocognitive impulsivity dimensions and externalizing/internalizing traits are correlated between siblings discordant for heroin and amphetamine dependence; and (2) which of these associations are common across substances and which are substance- specific.

methodsPearson correlations between individuals with 'pure' heroin and amphetamine dependence and their unaffected biological siblings (n = 37 heroin sibling pairs; n = 30 amphetamine sibling pairs) were run on 10 neurocognitive measures, 6 externalizing measures, and 5 internalizing measures. Sibling pair effects were further examined using regression.

resultsSiblings discordant for heroin dependence were significantly correlated on delay aversion on the Cambridge Gambling Task, risk-taking on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, sensation seeking, and hopelessness. Siblings discordant for amphetamine dependence were significantly correlated on the quality of decision-making on the Cambridge Gambling Task, discriminability on the Immediate Memory Task, commission errors on the Go/No Go Task, trait impulsivity, ADHD and anxiety sensitivity.

conclusionDimensions of impulsivity and externalizing/internalizing traits appear to aggregate among siblings discordant for substance dependence. Risk-taking propensity, sensation seeking and hopelessness were specific for heroin sibling pairs. Motor/action impulsivity, trait impulsivity, and anxiety sensitivity were specific to amphetamine sibling pairs. Decisional/choice impulsivity was common across both heroin and amphetamine sibling pairs. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the utility of neurocognitive impulsivity and externalizing/ internalizing traits as candidate endophenotypes for substance dependence in general and for substance-specific dependencies.

Indexed as

AdultAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceBehavior, AddictiveCognitionDecision MakingEndophenotypesFemaleHeroinHumansImpulsive BehaviorMental Status and Dementia TestsPersonality InventoryRisk AssessmentSiblingsSubstance-Related DisordersAmphetamineHeroinAddictionDiscordant siblingsEndophenotypesExternalizingImpulsivityInternalizing.

Identifiers

PMID32003694
PMCPMC8600509
OpenAlexW3004120296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.