Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32003552›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2020

Performance of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detecting Bone Marrow Infiltration in Lymphoma Cases

Mahmut Büyükşimşek, İrem Kolsuz, Abdullah Evren Yetişir, Mert Tohumcuoğlu, Ali Oğul, Cem Mirili, Semra Paydaş, İsa Burak Güney

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The utility ofRadiology and oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmut BüyükşimşekÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6356-9059
İrem KolsuzÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Adana, Turkey
Abdullah Evren YetişirÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7214-8184
Mert TohumcuoğluÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3653-4429
Ali OğulAdana Health Practice and Research Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4886-7060
Cem MiriliAtatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Erzurum, Turkey
Semra PaydaşÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4642-3693
İsa Burak GüneyÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Adana, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7642-9546
Cukurova University · TRAtatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Bone marrow infiltration (BMI) affects the stage diagnosis, and treatment of lymphoma. We aimed to evaluate the performance of bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting BMI in lymphoma patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 269 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and 110 Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) patients were evaluated retrospectively. Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for PET/CT and BMB in detecting BMI.ensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were calculated for PET/CT and BMB in detecting BMI. Results: Sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy for PET/CT in detecting BMI in NHL cases were 65%, 78%, and 84.4%, respectively, while they were 55%, 73.4%, and 79.9% for BMB. PET/CT performance for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma was better than that of BMB, whereas the performance of BMB was better for mantle-cell lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy for PET/CT in HL cases were 91.3%, 97.75%, and 98.18%, respectively, while they were 56.52%, 89.69%, and 90.91% for BMB. Due to BMB, 43 (15.9%) patients in the NHL group and 2 (1.8%) patients in the HL group were protected from downstaging. Conclusion: Although their results vary according to NHL subtypes, PET/CT and BMB are complementary methods in determining BMI. In HL, PET/CT is an important diagnostic tool for detecting BMI, and BMB is not necessary in a significant proportion of cases.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedBiopsyBone MarrowFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Bone marrow biopsyBone marrow infiltrationLymphomaPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID32003552
PMCPMC7702653
OpenAlexW3003651599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.