Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32003132›Full record

ArticleBJS open2020

Clinical and surgical outcomes of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma discussed at a monthly national multidisciplinary team video-conference meeting.

A Brandl, S Westbrook, S Nunn, E Arbuthnot-Smith, J Mulsow, H Youssef, N Carr, A Tzivanakis, S Dayal, F Mohamed and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New insights in the pathology of peritoneal surface malignancy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A BrandlPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1990-2584
S WestbrookPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
S NunnPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
E Arbuthnot-SmithPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
J MulsowNational Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
H YoussefGood Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
N CarrPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
A TzivanakisPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0128-0350
S DayalPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
F MohamedPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
B J MoranPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
T CecilPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.

Funding

Mesothelioma UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare primary neoplasm of the peritoneum with an increasing incidence worldwide. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown promise as a treatment strategy. A national PM multidisciplinary team (national PM MDT) video-conference meeting was established in the UK and Ireland in March 2016, aiming to plan optimal treatment, record outcomes and provide evidence for the benefits of centralization. This article reports on the activities and outcomes of the first 2·5 years.

methodsBetween March 2016 and December 2018, patients with PM, referred to peritoneal malignancy centres in Basingstoke, Birmingham, Manchester and Dublin, were discussed by the national PM MDT via video-conference. The MDT was composed of surgeons, radiologists, specialist nurses and pathologists. Patients were considered for CRS and HIPEC if considered fit for surgery and if radiological imaging suggested that complete surgical cytoreduction could be achieved. Morbidity and mortality following surgery were analysed. Survival analysis following MDT discussion was conducted.

resultsA total of 155 patients (M : F ratio 0·96) with a mean(s.d.) age of 57(17) years were discussed. To date, 22 (14·2 per cent) have had CRS and HIPEC; the median Peritoneal Cancer Index for the surgical group was 17·0. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 19 patients. Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications occurred in 16 patients; there was no grade III-IV morbidity or 30-day in-hospital mortality. The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 18·7 months, and the 2-year survival rate from time of first review at the national PM MDT was 68·3 per cent.

conclusionThe centralized national PM MDT was effective at selecting patients suitable for CRS and HIPEC, reporting a good outcome from patient selection.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamVideoconferencingAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyIrelandMaleMesotheliomaMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPeritoneal NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32003132
PMCPMC7093780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.