Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002838›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2020

Applications of Computer Modeling and Simulation in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Daniel Pearce, Sarah Fischer, Fatama Huda, Ali Vahdati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computational approaches in bioprinting processes.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Intervertebral Disc Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. [Application advances in the computational fluid dynamics in tissue engineering].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel PearceDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, 1000 E Fifth Street, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Sarah FischerDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, 1000 E Fifth Street, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Fatama HudaDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, 1000 E Fifth Street, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Ali VahdatiDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, 1000 E Fifth Street, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. vahdatia18@ecu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-8407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in cartilage tissue engineering have demonstrated noteworthy potential for developing cartilage for implantation onto sites impacted by joint degeneration and injury. To supplement resource-intensive in vivo and in vitro studies required for cartilage tissue engineering, computational models and simulations can assist in enhancing experimental design.

methodsResearch articles pertinent to cartilage tissue engineering and computer modeling were identified, reviewed, and summarized. Various applications of computer modeling for cartilage tissue engineering are highlighted, limitations of in silico modeling are addressed, and suggestions for future work are enumerated.

resultsComputational modeling can help better characterize shear stresses generated by bioreactor fluid flow, refine scaffold geometry, customize the mechanical properties of engineered cartilage tissue, and model rates of cell growth and dynamics. Thus, results from in silico studies can help resourcefully enhance in vitro and in vivo studies; however, the limitations of these studies, such as the underlying assumptions and simplifications applied in each model, should always be addressed and justified where applicable. In silico models should also seek validation and verification when possible.

conclusionFuture studies may adopt similar approaches to supplement in vitro trials and further investigate effects of mechanical stimulation on chondrocyte and stem cell dynamics. Additionally, as precision medicine, machine learning, and powerful open-source software become more popular and accessible, applications of multi-scale and multiphysics computational models in cartilage tissue engineering are expected to increase.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationBioreactorsCartilageChondrocytesComputersMachine LearningOxygenStress, MechanicalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsOxygenCartilageChondrogenesisComputer modelingIn silicoTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32002838
PMCPMC6992820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.