Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002832›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

Outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in upper gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors.

Zaheer Nabi, Mohan Ramchandani, Mahiboob Sayyed, Santosh Darisetty, Rama Kotla, Guduru Venkat Rao, D Nageshwar Reddy

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zaheer NabiAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India. zaheernabi1978@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-4781
Mohan RamchandaniAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Mahiboob SayyedAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Santosh DarisettyAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Rama KotlaAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Guduru Venkat RaoAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
D Nageshwar ReddyAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500 082, India.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubmucosal tunneling techniques have expanded the horizon of therapeutic endoscopy. One such procedure, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), enables the endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal (GI) sub-epithelial tumors. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER in patients with sub-epithelial lesions localized to the upper GI tract.

methodsConsecutive subjects with a sub-epithelial lesion of ≥ 1 cm size in the upper GI tract were enrolled in the study. STER was performed using the standard technique in an endoscopy suite. A modified technique (double-opening STER) was used in cases with difficult en bloc resection of the tumor. Outcome measures included technical success, en bloc resection rates, adverse events, and recurrence.

resultsA total of 104 patients with sub-epithelial tumors were evaluated for STER. Of them, 44 subjects (mean age 44.68 ± 12.82, 52.3% males) underwent standard STER. Majority (31, 70.4%) of the lesions were located in the esophagus and cardia. Technical success and en bloc removal of the tumor were achieved in 97.7% and 88.4% of cases, respectively. There was no major adverse event. Minor adverse events were recorded in 7 (15.9%) cases. Majority (31, 70.4%) of the tumors originated from muscularis propria, followed by submucosa (8, 18.2%) and muscularis mucosa (5, 11.4%). The most common histological diagnosis was leiomyoma (59.1%) followed by GI stromal tumors (20.4%). At a mean follow up of 12.36 ± 7.63 months, there was no incidence of tumor recurrence in en bloc as well as piecemeal resection groups.

conclusionSTER is a safe and efficacious procedure for sub-epithelial tumors in the upper GI tract. Novel strategies need to be developed to ensure en bloc removal of large lesions.

Indexed as

AdultCardiaEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAdverse eventsEfficacyEndoscopySubmucosal tumorsSubmucosal tunneling

Identifiers

PMID32002832
OpenAlexW3004312994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.