Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002778›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2020

Quantum chemical predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge.

Michael R Jones, Bernard R Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of log P, pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael R JonesLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-5690, USA. michael.jones7@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-0542-3796
Bernard R BrooksLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-5690, USA.

Funding

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of MacromoleculesZ01HL001050 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 1998 to 2008
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HL001050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical approaches for predicting physicochemical properties are valuable tools for accelerating the drug discovery process. In this work, quantum chemical methods are used to predict water-octanol partition coefficients as a part of the SAMPL6 blind challenge. The SMD continuum solvent model was employed with MP2 and eight DFT functionals in conjunction with correlation consistent basis sets to determine the water-octanol transfer free energy. Several tactics towards improving the predictions of the partition coefficient were examined, including increasing the quality of basis sets, considering tautomerization, and accounting for inhomogeneities in the water and n-octanol phases. Evaluation of these various schemes highlights the impact of modeling approaches across different methods. With the inclusion of tautomers and adjustments to the permittivity constants, the best predictions were obtained with smaller basis sets and the O3LYP functional, which yielded an RMSE of 0.79 logP units. The results presented correspond to the SAMPL6 logP submission IDs: DYXBT, O7DJK, and AHMTF.

Indexed as

ThermodynamicsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, ChemicalOctanolsQuantum TheorySolubilitySolventsWaterOctanolsSolventsWaterDFTImplicit solvationlogPPartition coefficientSAMPLSMDWater–octanol

Identifiers

PMID32002778
PMCPMC8690632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.