Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002673›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020

Use of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

Sebastian Schwind, Madlen Jentzsch, Enrica Bach, Sebastian Stasik, Christian Thiede, Uwe Platzbecker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. QuantifyingHemaSphere · 2024
    Article
  6. MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of CD30 expression in B ALL and its correlation with MRD(Minimum Residual Disease).Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian SchwindMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 22, Haus 7, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Madlen JentzschMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 22, Haus 7, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Enrica BachMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 22, Haus 7, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian StasikMedical Department I, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Christian ThiedeMedical Department I, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Uwe PlatzbeckerMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstrasse 22, Haus 7, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. haematologie@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DETU Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe expanding availability of minimal or more precisely measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with its possible implications for therapeutic decisions is of high interest to clinicians treating AML patients. A variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that AML patients with a positive MRD test, assessed by different techniques at defined cutoffs and time-points, are at significantly higher risk of relapse and experience shorter overall survival compared to MRD-negative patients. How this valuable information may be adapted in the daily routine of patients' treatment to distinguish individuals who need more aggressive therapy from the ones who can be spared additional therapy to avoid treatment-related toxicities is still being investigated. With the exception of MRD analyses in acute promyelocitic leukemia (APL), the clinical implications of MRD tests for the individual AML patient are still mostly unknown. We currently lack hard evidence that MRD-based therapy modulation during treatment or pre-emptive intervention in MRD-positive patients after therapy would improve outcomes in non-APL AML patients. These questions will be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials. Today, however, some conclusions with regard to MRD assessment in AML can be drawn from the published data and are reviewed in this article.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorAMLMeasurable residual diseasePre-emptive therapyRisk stratificationTherapeutic decisions

Identifiers

PMID32002673
OpenAlexW3003665837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.