Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002631›Full record

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Higher doses of loop diuretics limit uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Jozine M Ter Maaten, Pieter Martens, Kevin Damman, Kenneth Dickstein, Piotr Ponikowski, Chim C Lang, Leong L Ng, Stefan D Anker, Nilesh J Samani, Gerasimos Filippatos and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diuretics in Cardiovascular Disease: For How Long and at What Dose?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Protected risk stratification with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: results from the WEARIT-II-EUROPE registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 11 countries.

Jozine M Ter MaatenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pieter MartensZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Kevin DammanDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kenneth DicksteinUniversity of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Piotr PonikowskiDepartment of Heart Diseases, Poland and Cardiology Department, Military Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Chim C LangDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Leong L NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Gerasimos FilippatosHeart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Athens University Hospital Attikon, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
John G ClelandNational Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK.
Faiez ZannadINSERM, Centre D'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy and F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Hans L HillegeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dirk J van VeldhuisenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marco MetraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Institute of Cardiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Adriaan A VoorsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.a.voors@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-2992
Wilfried MullensZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Leicester · GBZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BEHarefield Hospital · GBInserm · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRStavanger University Hospital · NOUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Dundee · GBWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoop diuretics are frequently prescribed to patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for the treatment of congestion; however, they might hamper uptitration of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system.

methodsLoop diuretic dose at baseline was recorded in 2338 patients with HFrEF enrolled in BIOSTAT-CHF, an international study of HF patients on loop diuretic therapy who were eligible for uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). The association between loop diuretic dose and uptitration of ACEi/MRA to percentage of target dose was adjusted for a previously published model for likelihood of uptitration and a propensity score.

resultsBaseline median loop diuretic dose was 40 [40-100] mg of furosemide or equivalent. Higher doses of loop diuretics were associated with higher NYHA class and higher levels of NT-proBNP, more severe signs and symptoms of congestion, more frequent MRA use, and lower doses of ACEi reached at 3 and 9 months (all P < 0.01). After propensity adjustment, higher doses of loop diuretics remained significantly associated with poorer uptitration of ACEi (Beta per log doubling of loop diuretic dose: - 1.66, P = 0.021), but not with uptitration of MRAs (P = 0.758). Higher doses of loop diuretics were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization [HR per doubling of loop diuretic dose: 1.06 (1.01-1.12), P = 0.021].

conclusionsHigher doses of loop diuretics limited uptitration of ACEi in patients with HFrEF and were associated with a higher risk of death and/or HF hospitalization, independent of their lower likelihood of uptitration and higher baseline risk. This figure was created with images adapted from Servier Medical Art licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsProspective StudiesRenin-Angiotensin SystemSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsACEi/ARBGuideline recommended treatmentHeart failureLoop diuretics

Identifiers

PMID32002631
PMCPMC7375987
OpenAlexW3004186958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.