Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002591›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Influence of localization of PSMA-positive oligo-metastases on efficacy of metastasis-directed external-beam radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective study.

N-S Schmidt-Hegemann, S G C Kroeze, C Henkenberens, M M E Vogel, S Kirste, J Becker, I A Burger, T Derlin, P Bartenstein, M Eiber and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Patterns of care for prostate cancer radiotherapy-results from a survey among German-speaking radiation oncologists.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  12. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

N-S Schmidt-HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Nina-Sophie.Hegemann@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-3603
S G C KroezeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
C HenkenberensDepartment of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
M M E VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S KirsteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
J BeckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
I A BurgerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
T DerlinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
P BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
M EiberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
M MixDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Ch la FougèreDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
A C MüllerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
A L GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
S E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
H ChristiansenDepartment of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
M GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
C BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApproximately 40-70% of biochemically persistent or recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RPE) are oligo-metastatic in

methodsRetrospectively, 359 patients with PET-positive PCa recurrences after RPE were analyzed. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < post-radiotherapy nadir + 0.2 ng/mL) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis.

resultsAll patients were initially clinically without distant metastases (cM0). Seventy-five patients had local recurrence within the prostatic fossa, 32 patients had pelvic nodal plus local recurrence, 117 patients had pelvic nodal recurrence, 51 patients had paraaortic lymph node metastases with/without locoregional recurrence, and 84 patients had bone or visceral metastases with/without locoregional recurrence. Median PSA before MDR was 1.2 ng/mL (range, 0.04-47.5). Additive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in 35% (125/359) of patients. Median PSA nadir after MDR was 0.23 ng/mL (range, < 0.03-18.30). After a median follow-up of 16 months (1-57), 239/351 (68%) patients had no biochemical recurrence. Patients with distant lymph node and/or distant metastases, the so-called oligo-body cohort, had an overall in-field control of 90/98 (91%) but at the same time, an ex-field progress of 44/96 (46%). In comparison, an ex-field progress was detected in 28/154 (18%) patients with local and/or pelvic nodal recurrence (oligo-pelvis group). Compared with the oligo-pelvis group, there was a significantly lower BRFS in oligo-body patients at the last follow-up.

conclusionOverall, BRFS was dependent on patterns of metastatic disease. Thus, MDR of PSMA PET-positive oligo-metastases can be offered considering that about one-third of the patients progressed within a median follow-up of 16 months.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific AntigenDistributionExternal-beam radiotherapyProstate cancerPSMARecurrence

Identifiers

PMID32002591
OpenAlexW3003653119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.