ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020
The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast and implications on surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Pooled it
- Modeling the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A retrospective study.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of margin status on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving treatment for patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective multi-institutional study of 1813 cases.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Article
- Surgery versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced gastrointestinal tract cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: perspectives based on the survival outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of Margin Status on Local Recurrence in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Feasibility of Intraoperative Radiotherapy Tumor Bed Boost in Patients with Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- "Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Letter to the Editor: The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Letter to the Editor: The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Margin Assessment and Re-excision Rates for Patients Who Have Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Breast-Conserving Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can improve cosmesis by reducing resection volume. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) aims to achieve clear excision margins while optimizing cosmesis. However, the influence of NAC on margin re-excision after BCS is unclear. This study examines the rate and determinants of margin re-excision in patients undergoing BCS following NAC in our institution.
methodsFrom 2011-2015, all patients treated with NAC prior to BCS were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact test tests were used to compare variables in patients who did and did not require re-excision. Patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in 2015 comprised an unmatched comparison group.
resultsOf 211 patients treated with NAC, 69 initially underwent BCS. The re-excision rate was 32% (n = 22) compared to 17% in the primary operable group (38 of 221, p = 0.02). Re-excision rates were lowest in triple-negative and HER2+ tumors (0% and 10%, respectively). Lobular carcinoma and ER+ tumors had a significantly higher rate of re-excision (100% and 42%, respectively). Of 22 patients undergoing re-excision, 9 had further BCS and 13 had a mastectomy.
conclusionThe re-excision rate following NAC is almost twice that of patients who underwent primary operative management. Her2+ and triple-negative tumors have lower re-excision rates and may represent a selected cohort most suitable for BCS. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma or ER+ disease have significantly higher rates of margin positivity, and these patients should be considered for a cavity shave during primary surgery to reduce the rates of re-excision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.