Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002582›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Liam A Devane, Chwanrow K Baban, A O'Doherty, Cecily Quinn, Enda W McDermott, Ruth S Prichard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liam A DevaneDepartment of Breast Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7562-5780
Chwanrow K BabanDepartment of Breast Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
A O'DohertyDepartment of Radiology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Cecily QuinnDepartment of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Enda W McDermottDepartment of Breast Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ruth S PrichardDepartment of Breast Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. ruthprichard@rcsi.ie.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can improve cosmesis by reducing resection volume. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) aims to achieve clear excision margins while optimizing cosmesis. However, the influence of NAC on margin re-excision after BCS is unclear. This study examines the rate and determinants of margin re-excision in patients undergoing BCS following NAC in our institution.

methodsFrom 2011-2015, all patients treated with NAC prior to BCS were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact test tests were used to compare variables in patients who did and did not require re-excision. Patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in 2015 comprised an unmatched comparison group.

resultsOf 211 patients treated with NAC, 69 initially underwent BCS. The re-excision rate was 32% (n = 22) compared to 17% in the primary operable group (38 of 221, p = 0.02). Re-excision rates were lowest in triple-negative and HER2+ tumors (0% and 10%, respectively). Lobular carcinoma and ER+ tumors had a significantly higher rate of re-excision (100% and 42%, respectively). Of 22 patients undergoing re-excision, 9 had further BCS and 13 had a mastectomy.

conclusionThe re-excision rate following NAC is almost twice that of patients who underwent primary operative management. Her2+ and triple-negative tumors have lower re-excision rates and may represent a selected cohort most suitable for BCS. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma or ER+ disease have significantly higher rates of margin positivity, and these patients should be considered for a cavity shave during primary surgery to reduce the rates of re-excision.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyReoperationAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID32002582
OpenAlexW3004056333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.