Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002507›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2018

Participants' perspectives and preferences on clinical trial result dissemination: The TRUST Thyroid Trial experience.

Emmy Racine, Caroline Hurley, Aoife Cheung, Carol Sinnott, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Christine Baumgartner, Nicolas Rodondi, William H Smithson, Patricia M Kearney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants: A mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Emmy RacineSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-8369
Caroline HurleySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Aoife CheungSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Carol SinnottThe Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-7461
Karen Matvienko-SikarSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-6581
Christine BaumgartnerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nicolas RodondiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
William H SmithsonDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-3540
University College Cork · IEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical trial result disseminationPatient and public involvementpatient involvement in clinical trialsresearch disseminationstudy resultsstudy within a trialSWATtrial results.

Identifiers

PMID32002507
PMCPMC6973522
OpenAlexW2797032666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.