Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002491›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2019

DNA identification of compromised samples with massive parallel sequencing.

Andreas Tillmar, Ida Grandell, Kerstin Montelius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modern advances in disaster victim identification.Forensic sciences research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas TillmarDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.
Ida GrandellDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.
Kerstin MonteliusDepartment of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic profiling is a standard procedure for human identification, i.e. in criminal cases and mass disasters, and has been proven to be an important part in the process in the repatriation of victims to their relatives. In the event of a catastrophe whether it be a natural disaster, terror attack or accident, fatalities of many nationalities may be a consequence and international collaboration becomes necessary. Current DNA techniques used on a routine basis at forensic laboratories world-wide are very useful, and results reported from different labs are compared, making it possible to be matched in order to declare the identification of a victim. Statistical calculations of possibilities of a random match are achievable since population data from many parts of the world are available. However, decomposition and degradation of the remains are not uncommon in the aftermath of a catastrophe and hence it may be difficult to retrieve detailed DNA profiles from such samples. Massive parallel sequencing (MPS) is a technique capable of producing a vast amount of DNA sequence data in a high-through put manner, and panels of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers allow the amplification of small DNA fragments, often seen in compromised samples. Here, we report the results from a set of 10 samples from missing person identification cases, analyzed with an MPS based method comprising 131 SNP markers and compared with direct reference material or buccal swab samples collected from relatives of the deceased. We assess the weight of evidence of a match by statistical calculation. Furthermore, we compare results reported on different platforms using different SNP panels, and conclude that more work has to be done if results from missing person identification cases analyzed on MPS with SNP panels at different laboratories are to be fully reliable and thus comparable.

Indexed as

disaster victim identificationforensic geneticsForensic sciencemass disastermassive parallel sequencingSNP

Identifiers

PMID32002491
PMCPMC6968675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.