Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002339›Full record

Article3 Biotech2020

Whole-genome diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium analysis of globally diverse wheat genotypes using genotyping-by-sequencing DArTseq platform.

Mojgan Mahboubi, Rahim Mehrabi, Amir Mohammad Naji, Reza Talebi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mojgan MahboubiCollege of Agriculture, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
Rahim Mehrabi2Department of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, PO Box 8415683111, Isfahan, Iran.
Amir Mohammad Naji3Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza TalebiCollege of Agriculture, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9109-7677
Islamic Azad University Sanandaj Branch · IRIsfahan University of Technology · IRShahed University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, 129 wheat genotypes from globally diverse origins were genotyped using DArTseq (SilicoDArT and SNP) markers. After filtering markers for quality-filtering, 14,270 SilicoDArTs and 6484 SNPs were retained and used for genetic diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium analyses. The highest number of SilicoDArT and SNP markers mapped on genome A and B compared to genome D. In both marker types, polymorphism information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.1 to 0.5, while > 0.80% of SilicoDArTs and > 0.44% SNPs showed PIC value more than median (0.25%). Un-weighted Neighbor Joining cluster analysis and Bayesian-based model population structure grouped wheat genotypes into three and four clusters, respectively. Principal component analysis and discriminant analysis of principal component results showed highly match with cluster and population structure analysis. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was more extensive in both marker types, while graphical display of LD decay for both marker types showed that LD declined in the region close to 15 kbp, where

Indexed as

Genetic diversityLinkage disequilibriumPopulation structureSilicoDArTSNPWheat

Identifiers

PMID32002339
PMCPMC6960278
OpenAlexW3000654878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.