Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32002338›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

CD86

Dalong Sun, Tiancheng Luo, Pingping Dong, Ningping Zhang, Jing Chen, Shuncai Zhang, Longzi Liu, Ling Dong, Si Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Myeloid cells in chronic liver inflammation.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Accelerating and protective effects toward cancer growth in cGAS and FcgRIIb deficient mice, respectively, an impact of macrophage polarization.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dalong Sun *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tiancheng Luo *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Pingping DongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ningping ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuncai ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Longzi LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Ling DongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Si ZhangNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugate Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNShanghai Institute of Hematology · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNFudan University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the main cellular ingredients of tumor microenvironment, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a vital role in tumor development and progression. Recent studies have suggested that TAMs are sensitive and specific prognostic factors in numerous cancers. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of TAMs in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

methodsImmunohistochemical staining of CD68, CD86 and CD206 were performed in tissue microarrays containing 322 patients, who underwent surgical resection and were pathologically diagnosed with ICC. The prognostic value of CD68, CD86 and CD206 were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test) and nomogram models.

resultsWe demonstrated that the CD86

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the CD86

Indexed as

CA-199CD206CD86Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaPrognosisTumor-associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID32002338
PMCPMC6982414
OpenAlexW3001331395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.