Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32001444›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

A Method to Estimate Brain Volume from Head CT Images and Application to Detect Brain Atrophy in Alzheimer Disease.

V Adduru, S A Baum, C Zhang, M Helguera, R Zand, M Lichtenstein, C J Griessenauer, A M Michael

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain atrophy and endovascular treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the MR CLEAN trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

V AdduruFrom the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences (V.A., A.M.M.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-0922
S A BaumChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (V.A., S.A.B., C.Z., M.H., A.M.M.), Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-8224
C ZhangNeuroscience Institute (V.A., C.Z., R.Z., M.L., C.J.G., A.M.M.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-5080
M HelgueraChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (V.A., S.A.B., C.Z., M.H., A.M.M.), Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5540-7268
R ZandNeuroscience Institute (V.A., C.Z., R.Z., M.L., C.J.G., A.M.M.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-0094
M LichtensteinNeuroscience Institute (V.A., C.Z., R.Z., M.L., C.J.G., A.M.M.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6270-575X
C J GriessenauerNeuroscience Institute (V.A., C.Z., R.Z., M.L., C.J.G., A.M.M.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2952-3812
A M MichaelFrom the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences (V.A., A.M.M.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina andrew.michael@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8846-4867
Rochester Institute of Technology · USGeisinger Neuroscience Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTotal brain volume and total intracranial volume are important measures for assessing whole-brain atrophy in Alzheimer disease, dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. Unlike MR imaging, which has a number of well-validated fully-automated methods, only a handful of methods segment CT images. Available methods either use enhanced CT, do not estimate both volumes, or require formal validation. Reliable computation of total brain volume and total intracranial volume from CT is needed because head CTs are more widely used than head MRIs in the clinical setting. We present an automated head CT segmentation method (CTseg) to estimate total brain volume and total intracranial volume. MATERIALS AND

methodsCTseg adapts a widely used brain MR imaging segmentation method from the Statistical Parametric Mapping toolbox using a CT-based template for initial registration. CTseg was tested and validated using head CT images from a clinical archive.

resultsCTseg showed excellent agreement with 20 manually segmented head CTs. The intraclass correlation was 0.97 (

conclusionsIn current clinical practice, brain atrophy is assessed by inaccurate and subjective "eyeballing" of CT images. Manual segmentation of head CT images is prohibitively arduous and time-consuming. CTseg can potentially help clinicians to automatically measure total brain volume and detect and track atrophy in neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, CTseg can be applied to large clinical archives for a variety of research studies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAtrophyBrainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32001444
PMCPMC7015210
OpenAlexW3003403583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.