Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32001273›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2020

Effects of maternal stress and nutrient restriction during gestation on offspring neuroanatomy in humans.

Katja Franke, Bea R H Van den Bergh, Susanne R de Rooij, Nasim Kroegel, Peter W Nathanielsz, Florian Rakers, Tessa J Roseboom, Otto W Witte, Matthias Schwab

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations of gestational age with gyrification and neurocognition in healthy adults.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Katja FrankeDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. Electronic address: katja.franke@uni-jena.de.
Bea R H Van den BerghResearch Group on Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department for Welfare, Public Health and Family, Flemish Government, Brussels, Belgium.
Susanne R de RooijDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nasim KroegelDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; acatech - National Academy of Science and Engineering, Berlin, Germany.
Peter W NathanielszTexas Pregnancy & Life Course Health Research Center, Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, United States; Dept. of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States.
Florian RakersDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Otto W WitteDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Matthias SchwabDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLKU Leuven · BETexas Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

Womb to Tomb: Developmental Programming and Aging Interactions in PrimatesU19AG057758 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLARKE, GEOFFREY DAVID, COX, LAURA A · 2018 to 2024
$13.2M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive and mental health are major determinants of quality of life, allowing integration into society at all ages. Human epidemiological and animal studies indicate that in addition to genetic factors and lifestyle, prenatal environmental influences may program neuropsychiatric disorders in later life. While several human studies have examined the effects of prenatal stress and nutrient restriction on brain function and mental health in later life, potentially mediating effects of prenatal stress and nutrient restriction on offspring neuroanatomy in humans have been studied only in recent years. Based on neuroimaging and anatomical data, we comprehensively review the studies in this emerging field. We relate prenatal environmental influences to neuroanatomical abnormalities in the offspring, measured in utero and throughout life. We also assess the relationship between neuroanatomical abnormalities and cognitive and mental disorders. Timing- and gender-specific effects are considered, if reported. Our review provides evidence for adverse effects of an unfavorable prenatal environment on structural brain development that may contribute to the risk for cognitive, behavioral and mental health problems throughout life.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsFemaleHumansNeuroanatomyNutrientsPregnancyQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalNutrientsBrain developmentBrain morphologyMaternal anxietyMaternal depressionMaternal stressMRINutrient restrictionPregnancyPrenatal malnutrition

Identifiers

PMID32001273
PMCPMC8207653
OpenAlexW3003528752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.