Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32001108›Full record

ArticleNeuron2020

Neural Correlates of Reinforcement Learning in Mid-lateral Cerebellum.

Naveen Sendhilnathan, Mulugeta Semework, Michael E Goldberg, Anna E Ipata

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unsupervised nonmotor learning in the human cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Human Cerebellum Encodes Temporally Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Impulsivity in cerebellar ataxia: an online, multidimensional assessment.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  6. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Brain-Behavior Relationships: Neural Mechanisms of Impulsivity and Compulsivity in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Synergistic Reinforcement Learning by Cooperation of the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Social and emotional learning in the cerebellum.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naveen SendhilnathanDoctoral Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Mahoney Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: ns3046@columbia.edu.
Mulugeta SemeworkDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Mahoney Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Michael E GoldbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Mahoney Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Anna E IpataDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Mahoney Center for Brain and Behavior Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
ResourceP40OD010996 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2024
$11.0M
The Cerebro-Cerebellar-Basal-Gangliar Network for Visuomotor LearningR01NS113078 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FUSI, STEFANO, GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2019 to 2023
$5.3M
The Neurophysiology of Visual Search: Oculomotor and Visual MechanismsR01EY017039 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2008 to 2018
$3.8M
Instrument development &fabrication for vision researchR24EY015634 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
The Cortical Representation of Oculomotor ProprioceptionR21EY017938 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2007 to 2008
$463k
The role of the cerebellum in visual learningR21EY028749 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2018 to 2019
$453k
The Neurophysiology of visual memoryR21EY020631 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E. · 2010 to 2010
$242k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017039NEI NIH HHS R21 EY017938NEI NIH HHS R21 EY020631NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028749NEI NIH HHS R24 EY015634NIH HHS P40 OD010996NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the cerebellum in non-motor learning is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the activity of Purkinje cells (P-cells) in the mid-lateral cerebellum as the monkey learned to associate one arbitrary symbol with the movement of the left hand and another with the movement of the right hand. During learning, but not when the monkey had learned the association, the simple spike responses of P-cells reported the outcome of the animal's most recent decision without concomitant changes in other sensorimotor parameters such as hand movement, licking, or eye movement. At the population level, P-cells collectively maintained a memory of the most recent decision throughout the entire trial. As the monkeys learned the association, the magnitude of this reward-related error signal approached zero. Our results provide a major departure from the current understanding of cerebellar processing and have critical implications for cerebellum's role in cognitive control.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsAssociation LearningCerebellar NucleiCerebellumMacaca mulattaPhotic StimulationPurkinje CellsRewardcerebellumcognitioncomplex spikecrus Icrus IIlearningPurkinje cellreinforcement learningsimple spikevisuomotor association learning

Identifiers

PMID32001108
PMCPMC8015782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.