ArticleGenome medicine2020
A highly sensitive and specific workflow for detecting rare copy-number variants from exome sequencing data.
Article in Genome medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- The importance of integrating genetic testing into reproductive medicine: a retrospective observational study investigating the monogenic causes of human infertility in couples considering ICSI.Journal of human genetics · 2026Observational
- The utility of CNV analysis in identifying the molecular etiology of pediatric epilepsy patients.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- High Concordance of Copy Number Variants Detected by Chromosomal Microarray and Exome Sequencing in Clinical Diagnostics.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- Whole exome sequencing: a new era in prenatal diagnostics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The hidden Markov model and its applications in bioinformatics analysis.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Genetic Characterization of 128 Chinese Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders via Whole-Exome Sequencing.Developmental neuroscience · 2025Article
- Analytical validation of germline small variant detection using long-read HiFi genome sequencing.Genome research · 2025Article
- Contribution of families using the GenIDA database to the description of MED13L syndrome and literature review.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Review
- Chromosomal quality control in hPSCs: A practical guide to SNP array analysis with GenomeStudio.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Improves the Identification of Pathogenic and Novel Variation in Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss.Human mutation · 2025Article
- A 250-kb Microdeletion Identified in Chromosome 16 Is Associated With Non-Syndromic Sensorineural Hearing Loss in a South Indian Consanguineous Family.Journal of audiology & otology · 2025Article
- Optimizing sequence data analysis using convolution neural network for the prediction of CNV bait positions.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Genetic analysis of 280 children with unexplained developmental delay or intellectual disability using whole exome sequencing.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- A method to comprehensively identify germline SNVs, INDELs and CNVs from whole exome sequencing data of BRCA1/2 negative breast cancer patients.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis, and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Validated WGS and WES protocols proved saliva-derived gDNA as an equivalent to blood-derived gDNA for clinical and population genomic analyses.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Genetic screening of a Chinese cohort of children with hearing loss using a next-generation sequencing panel.Human genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExome sequencing (ES) is a first-tier diagnostic test for many suspected Mendelian disorders. While it is routine to detect small sequence variants, it is not a standard practice in clinical settings to detect germline copy-number variants (CNVs) from ES data due to several reasons relating to performance. In this work, we comprehensively characterized one of the most sensitive ES-based CNV tools, ExomeDepth, against SNP array, a standard of care test in clinical settings to detect genome-wide CNVs.
methodsWe propose a modified ExomeDepth workflow by excluding exons with low mappability prior to variant calling to drastically reduce the false positives originating from the repetitive regions of the genome, and an iterative variant calling framework to assess the reproducibility. We used a cohort of 307 individuals with clinical ES data and clinical SNP array to estimate the sensitivity and false discovery rate of the CNV detection using exome sequencing. Further, we performed targeted testing of the STRC gene in 1972 individuals. To reduce the number of variants for downstream analysis, we performed a large-scale iterative variant calling process with random control cohorts to assess the reproducibility of the CNVs.
resultsThe modified workflow presented in this paper reduced the number of total variants identified by one third while retaining a higher sensitivity of 97% and resulted in an improved false discovery rate of 11.4% compared to the default ExomeDepth pipeline. The exclusion of exons with low mappability removes 4.5% of the exons, including a subset of exons (0.6%) in disease-associated genes which are intractable by short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results from the reproducibility analysis showed that the clinically reported variants were reproducible 100% of the time and that the modified workflow can be used to rank variants from high to low confidence. Targeted testing of 30 CNVs identified in STRC, a challenging gene to ascertain by NGS, showed a 100% validation rate.
conclusionsIn summary, we introduced a modification to the default ExomeDepth workflow to reduce the false positives originating from the repetitive regions of the genome, created a large-scale iterative variant calling framework for reproducibility, and provided recommendations for implementation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.