Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32000813›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

A clinical-radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Menglei Li, Jing Zhang, Yibo Dan, Yefeng Yao, Weixing Dai, Guoxiang Cai, Guang Yang, Tong Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical-radiomics nomogram construction from magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose osteoporosis: a preliminary study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Menglei LiDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
Yibo DanShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
Yefeng YaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
Weixing DaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Guoxiang CaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China. gyang@phy.ecnu.edu.cn.
Tong TongDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. t983352@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is of great significance for treatment decision making and prognostic evaluation. We aimed to develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram for the individual preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients.

methodsWe enrolled 766 patients (458 in the training set and 308 in the validation set) with clinicopathologically confirmed CRC. We included nine significant clinical risk factors (age, sex, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor size, tumor location, histotype, differentiation and M stage) to build the clinical model. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA), relief and recursive feature elimination (RFE) for feature selection (including clinical risk factors and the imaging features of primary lesions and peripheral lymph nodes), established classification models with logistic regression analysis and selected the respective candidate models by fivefold cross-validation. Then, we combined the clinical risk factors, primary lesion radiomics features and peripheral lymph node radiomics features of the candidate models to establish combined predictive models. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) and a nomogram were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model.

resultsThe clinical-primary lesion radiomics-peripheral lymph node radiomics model, with the highest AUC value (0.7606), was regarded as the candidate model and had good discrimination and calibration in both the training and validation sets. DCA demonstrated that the clinical-radiomics nomogram was useful for preoperative prediction in the clinical environment.

conclusionThe present study proposed a clinical-radiomics nomogram with a combination of clinical risk factors and radiomics features that can potentially be applied in the individualized preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNomogramsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32000813
PMCPMC6993349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.