Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32000744›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Study protocol: randomized controlled trial of manualized components in home visitation to reduce mothers' risk for child maltreatment.

Merel de Wit, Patty Leijten, Claudia van der Put, Jessica Asscher, Merian Bouwmeester-Landweer, Maja Deković

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merel de WitResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15780, 1001, NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.dewit@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5818-9841
Patty LeijtenResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15780, 1001, NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Claudia van der PutResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15780, 1001, NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jessica AsscherResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15780, 1001, NG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Merian Bouwmeester-LandweerThe Netherlands Center for Preventive Youth Health (NCJ), Churchilllaan 11, 3527, GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maja DekovićClinical Child and Family Studies, Utrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508, TC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NLNetherlands Youth Institute · NL

Funding

ZonMw 741100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study tests whether home visitation to prevent child maltreatment can be improved by adding manualized program components, targeting four key risk factors for child maltreatment: low parental self-efficacy, high levels of perceived stress, parental anger, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Home visitation is widely implemented, but effects on child maltreatment risk tend to be modest at best. Home visitation tends to be rather flexible (i.e., professionals decide how to support each family). We will test whether adding manualized program components increases program effectiveness, by ensuring that key risk factors are addressed, while maintaining flexibility. In addition, we will test whether any component effects on reduced child maltreatment risk can be explained (i.e., is mediated) by ameliorated risk factors. Lastly, we will test whether the components are more effective for some mothers (e.g., those at highest child maltreatment risk) than for others.

methodsWe will conduct a randomized controlled trial among 398 mothers enrolled in a Dutch home visiting program targeting families at risk for child maltreatment. Mothers in the experimental group will receive the manualized components in two consecutive home visits, while mothers in the control group will receive regular home visits (care as usual). Mothers will fill out questionnaires at four time points: before and after each of the two home visits. Outcome variables include the four targeted risk factors parental self-efficacy, perceived stress, parental anger, and (recognition of) post-traumatic stress symptoms, as well as parenting practices (e.g., rejection and affection), and risk for child maltreatment. DISCUSSION: This study aims to determine whether adding manualized program components to a flexible home visiting program increases program effectiveness on risk for child maltreatment. In addition, our test of whether the effects of the components on risk for child maltreatment is explained (i.e., mediated) by amelioration of the targeted risk factors, may contribute to our understanding of the role of these risk factors in child maltreatment. Our tests of which mothers benefit most from adding the components may help move the field towards evidence-based personalized family support.

trial registrationThis trial has been retrospectively registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL8005).

Indexed as

House CallsAdultChildChild AbuseChild, PreschoolChild RearingFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersNetherlandsProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicChild maltreatmentHome visitationManualized programPreventionProgram components

Identifiers

PMID32000744
PMCPMC6993430
OpenAlexW3005436420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.