ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Serelaxin Improves Regional Myocardial Function in Experimental Heart Failure: An In Vivo Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Searching for Effective Treatments in HFpEF: Implications for Modeling the Disease in Rodents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Application of Magnetic Resonance Strain Analysis Using Feature Tracking in a Myocardial Infarction Model.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Longitudinal CMR assessment of cardiac global longitudinal strain and hemodynamic forces in a mouse model of heart failure.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Detection of myocardial fibrosis: Where we stand.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Serelaxin Improves Regional Myocardial Function in Experimental Heart Failure: An In Vivo Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Animal studies demonstrated that serelaxin lessens fibrosis in heart failure. This study assessed its effect on myocardial deformation using cardiac magnetic resonance and elucidated its relationship to gene regulation and histology in a mouse heart failure model. Methods and Results C57BL/6J mice were subjected to SHAM (n=4) or transverse aortic constriction (TAC). At week 10, TAC mice were randomized to receive either serelaxin (0.5 mg/kg per day; n=11) or vehicle (n=13) for 4 weeks. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the study (week 14). Cine images were used to calculate left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain. Hearts were examined for histology and gene expression. Compared with SHAM, mice 10 weeks after TAC showed increased LV mass with significant decreases in LV deformation parameters, indicating subclinical deterioration of myocardial function. At week 14, TAC mice given serelaxin demonstrated significant improvements in all LV strain parameters and no decrease in LV stroke volume and ejection fraction compared with TAC mice given vehicle. A significant positive correlation between global circumferential strain and the extent of myocardial fibrosis was found, and global circumferential strain correlated significantly with the expression of heart failure genes in serelaxin-treated mice. Conclusions Serelaxin improved cardiac magnetic resonance-derived myocardial deformation parameters as well as histomorphometric and gene expression findings in mice with heart failure. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived myocardial mechanics correlate with histology and gene expression, stressing its utilization in myocardial remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.