Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32000564›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics

Evaluating liquid biopsies for methylomic profiling of prostate cancer.

Romina Silva, Bruce Moran, Niamh M Russell, Ciara Fahey, Tatjana Vlajnic, Rustom P Manecksha, Stephen P Finn, Donal J Brennan, William M Gallagher, Antoinette S Perry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. NAR cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Romina SilvaCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5429-0152
Bruce MoranCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7266-0265
Niamh M RussellCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5003-8646
Ciara FaheyProstate Molecular Oncology, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.
Tatjana VlajnicDepartment of Histopathology, St James's Hospital , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-6771
Rustom P ManeckshaDepartment of Urology, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3437-744X
Stephen P FinnDepartment of Histopathology, St James's Hospital , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8628-5814
Donal J BrennanCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.
William M GallagherCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-5999
Antoinette S PerryCancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6108-512X
University College Dublin · IETrinity College Dublin · IESt. James's Hospital · IEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid biopsies offer significant potential for informing on cancer progression and therapeutic resistance via minimally invasive serial monitoring of genetic alterations. Although the cancer epigenome is a central driving force in most neoplasia, the accuracy of monitoring the tumor methylome using liquid biopsies remains relatively unknown.

objectivesto investigate how well two types of liquid biopsy (urine and blood) capture the prostate cancer methylome, and may thus serve as a non-invasive surrogate for studying the tumor epigenome.

methodsA cohort of four metastatic treatment naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients was selected. Matched biopsy cores (tumor and histologically matched-normal), post-DRE, pre-biopsy urine, and peripheral blood plasma were available for each subject. DNA methylation was profiled utilizing the Infinium® MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina) and analysed using the RnBeads software. Significantly (FDR adjusted

resultsDNA methylation analysis of urine and blood in men with metastatic PCa showed highly correlated patterns between the different liquid types (ρ = 0.93,

conclusionWe conclude that both urine and blood plasma are easily accessible and sensitive biofluids for the study of PCa epigenomic alterations.

Indexed as

EpigenomeAgedBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorcfDNADNA methylationepigenomicsliquid biopsiesProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32000564
PMCPMC7574384
OpenAlexW3003395047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.