Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32000454›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Normative values for Glazer Protocol in the evaluation of pelvic floor muscle bioelectrical activity.

Łukasz Oleksy, Małgorzata Wojciechowska, Anna Mika, Elżbieta Antos, Dorota Bylina, Renata Kielnar, Błażej Pruszczyński, Artur Stolarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of Female Pelvic Floor Muscles: An Integrative Review.International journal of women's health · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Łukasz OleksyPhysiotherapy and Sports Centre, Rzeszow University of Technology.
Małgorzata WojciechowskaFaculty of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Nursing, Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw.
Anna MikaDepartment of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Krakow.
Elżbieta AntosFaculty of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Nursing, Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw.
Dorota BylinaChair of Natural Sciences, Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Faculty of Physical Education in Biala Podlaska.
Renata KielnarMedical College of Rzeszow University.
Błażej PruszczyńskiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Paediatric Orthopaedics Medical University of Lodz.
Artur StolarczykOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate pelvic floor muscle bioelectrical activity in healthy, young, and nulliparous women, and to present normative values for all phases and parameters measured with the Glazer Protocol.In this study, 96 healthy, young, nulliparous women (age 22-27 years; 168.6 ± 5.1 cm; 57.1 ± 11.8 kg) were tested. The bioelectrical activity of the pelvic floor muscles was collected using an endovaginal electrode with the Glazer Protocol, which included the following series of muscles contractions and relaxations: pre-baseline rest, phasic contractions, tonic contractions, isometric contractions for muscle endurance evaluation, and post-baseline rest.The following normative values of the bioelectrical signal for all phases of the Glazer Protocol were calculated: mean, minimal, and maximal values, 95% confidence interval, standard deviation, 95% standard deviation confidence interval, variance, coefficient of variation, and standard error of measurement. Average Mean Amplitude (μV) was as follows: pre-baseline rest (6.26 ± 3.33 μV), phasic contractions (49.76 ± 26.44 μV), tonic contractions (37.05 ± 25.99 μV), endurance contraction (16.10 ± 6.68 μV), and post-baseline rest (6.93 ± 3.99 μV).This study was the first in which normative values for all phases of the Glazer Protocol were reported. This protocol is very often used in electromyography devices as a tool for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Due to the fact that the interpretation of the pelvic floor muscle evaluation is complex and difficult, the authors believe that the normative values proposed in this study allow for comprehensive interpretation of this test (both qualitatively and quantitatively) and provide a reference point for parameters measured in women with different pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPelvic FloorReference Values

Identifiers

PMID32000454
PMCPMC7004594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.