ArticleMedicine2020
Preoperative assessment of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography of diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy: Correlation to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 5-year postoperative follow-up.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast-enhanced mammography for tumor size assessment and detection of multifocal and multicentric disease in breast cancer subtypes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Literature Review of Clinical Uses for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Oncology.Cancers · 2024Review
- CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Review of Imaging Modalities with Special Focus on Pathology Concordance.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Breast MRI: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2023Review
- Impact of contrast-enhanced mammography in surgical management of breast cancers for women with dense breasts: a dual-center, multi-disciplinary study in Asia.European radiology · 2022Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Mammography versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Diagnostic Challenge of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: What Is the News? Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Emerging Role of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A case report of breast cancer in silicone-injected breasts diagnosed by an emerging technique of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Screening Multifocal and Multicentric Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.Radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for operative planning of patients with breast cancers who were initially diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy.With the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with breast cancers who underwent CESM and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) prior to operation and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. The patients with breast cancer diagnosed by sonographic guided biopsy without mammography were included for analysis. The size and number of cancers on low-energy mammograms (LE-MG), recombined subtracted mammograms (RSM), and CE-MRI were recorded and compared with microscopic histopathologic data and at least 5 years of clinical follow-up data.Fifty-one cancerous breasts of 46 patients were included in the analysis. All the principal cancers could be detected by RSM or CE-MRI; however, only 45 were by LE-MG. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the size on microscopy were 0.44 for LE-MG, 0.77 for RSM, and 0.84 for CE-MRI (all P-values ≤.001). Regarding the microscopic reports, RSM or CE-MRI had sensitivities of 100% and a positive predictive value of 63.6% for multicentric cancers. One breast cancer with partial mastectomy recurred after 3 years of follow-up.CESM was feasible for assessing the cancer extension and multicentric cancers as secondary examination in patients with diagnosed breast cancers after sonographic biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.