ArticleMedicine2020
Effects of lung protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary outcomes for prolonged oral cancer combined with free flap surgery.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategies on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- The Early Effects of Coronavirus Disease-2019 on Head and Neck Oncology and Microvascular Reconstruction Practice: A National Survey of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Enrolled in the Head and Neck Special Interest Group.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intraoperative lung protective ventilation with low tidal volume, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intermittent lungs recruitment was found to decrease postoperative pulmonary complications. In this retrospective medical records study, we investigated the effects of lung protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary outcomes among the patients received prolonged oral cancer combined with free flap surgery.We collected the medical records of the patients received oral cancer surgery with the operation time more than 12 hours from January 2011 to December 2015. We recordedFifty nine cases were included. Thirty cases received the lung protective ventilation and 29 cases received conventional ventilation. Compared to the patients received conventional ventilation, the patients received intraoperative lung protective ventilation showedIn conclusion, for the prolonged oral cancer combined with free flap surgery, the intraoperative lung protective ventilation improves postoperative pulmonary outcomes and decreases the duration of ICU stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.