ReviewMedicine2020
Percutaneous coronary intervention for congenital absence of the right coronary artery with acute myocardial infarction: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Congenital absence of the right coronary artery: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Congenital absence of the right coronary artery with acute myocardial infarction: report of two cases and review of the literature.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleCongenital absence of the right coronary artery with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a rare clinical situation that may lead to death. We report a case of successful percutaneous coronary intervention for congenital absence of the right coronary artery with AMI. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 53-year-old woman had a 7-day history of chest discomfort that had worsened over 10 hours. She was diagnosed as having myocardial infarction and was admitted to hospital. DIAGNOSIS: Coronary angiography showed absence of the right coronary artery; the left anterior descending (LAD) branch sent out the right ventricular branch and the posterior descending branch. The LAD branch was occluded and there was diffuse stenosis of the middle right ventricular branch and severe stenosis of the distal circumflex branch.
interventionsPercutaneous coronary intervention was performed. One stent was implanted in the LAD branch and another implanted in the right ventricular branch. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged 3 weeks after surgery. The follow-up showed that the patient was asymptomatic without recurrence. LESSONS: Although absence of the right coronary artery with AMI is a fatal condition, percutaneous coronary intervention remains an effective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.