ArticleMedicine2020
Cardiac adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis: A protocol for systematic review.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiotoxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Current status and future challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProgrammed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been increasingly used in the treatment of cancer. Immunosuppressive therapy can control the cancer well and is suitable for the moderate to severe diseases. However, according to clinical observation, immune-related cardiac adverse events against PD-1or/and PD-L1 are inevitable, but generally reversible. Understanding the cardiac adverse events of PD-1 or/and PD-L1 inhibitors is crucial to improve the anti-cancer efficacy and ensure the life safety of patients. The variability of cardiac adverse events between different immunosuppressants and different cancers is not clear. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol established in this study has been reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to December 2019. We will use a combination of Medical Subject Heading, and free-text terms with various synonyms to search based on the Eligibility criteria. We will include RCTs on PD-1 or/and PD-L1 inhibitors therapy to analyze. In addition, our study will include some clinical trials. All relevant RCTs will be included, such as early phase I/II, phase III experimental trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined above, the full texts of each eligible study will be retrieved for further identification by one reviewer. Two authors will screen the titles and abstracts of all records retrieved in above electronic databases independently to find potentially eligible reviews. Data will be extracted by 2 reviewers independently using a pre-designed data extraction form. The other reviewer will validate data. I-square (I) test, substantial heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment will be performed accordingly. For our network meta-analysis, we will use Stata 15.0 and WinBUGS 1.4.3. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval and patient consent would be not required because the data of this network meta-analysis mainly are obtained from existing resources. This network meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42019142865.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.