ArticleMedicine2020
Temozolomide plus whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: A protocol of an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- E3 ligase LMO7 enhances temozolomide sensitivity by promoting MGMT degradation in lung cancer.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Prophylactic cerebral irradiation sensitizes relapsed sensitive small cell lung cancer to temozolomide: A retrospective cohort study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- The efficiency and safety of temozolomide and PD-1/L1 inhibitors in pretreated NSCLC with brain metastasis: a retrospective cohort.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the mainstay treatment of brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for years. Temozolomide (TMZ) could penetrate the blood-brain barrier and some studies showed that TMZ plus MBRT may improve clinical effectiveness. This meta-analysis is aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of TMZ plus MBRT in the NSCLC patients with BM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database) without language restrictions from inception until July 26, 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared TMZ plus WBRT with single WBRT in the advanced NSCLC patients with BM were included. The outcomes analysis reported objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QOL), and adverse effects. Two reviewers will independently extract data from the selected studies and assess the quality of studies. Statistical analyses will be performed using Review manager 5.3 software. Random-effects or fixed models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratio and relative risk.
resultsThis systemic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the effects of TMZ plus MBRT in the NSCLC patients with BM in RCTs.
conclusionOur study will provide evidence to judge if TMZ plus MBRT are effective treatment for NSCLC patients with BM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.