Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32000173›Full record

SynthesisNuclear medicine communications2020

Performance of 68Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT, octreoscan SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of culprit tumors causing osteomalacia: a meta-analysis.

Yuanyuan Jiang, Guozhu Hou, Wuying Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nuclear medicine communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond DOTATATE: [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosis and Management of Hypophosphatemic Disorders.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Postoperative outcome and clinical management of tumor-induced osteomalacia: a single-center retrospective cohort study on 117 patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Unmasking Skull Base Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumors: A Rare and Treatable Cause of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuanyuan JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
Guozhu HouDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
Wuying ChengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to assess and compare the performance of Ga-DOTA-conjugated-somatostatin-receptor-targeting-peptides (Ga-DOTA-SST) PET/CT, octreoscan-SPECT/CT and F-FDG-PET/CT in the detection of tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO).

methodsRelevant studies reporting the performance Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT, octreoscan-SPECT/CT and F-FDG-PET/CT in TIO were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (last updated June 2019). Two authors independently extracted the numbers of true and false positives, and true and false negatives. The pooled estimates on a per-patient basis were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) obtained using a random-effects model.

resultsFourteen studies comprising 346 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis provided the following results on a per-patient analysis. The pooled sensitivities of both Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT (90%, 95% CI 82-95%) and octreoscan-SPECT/CT (83%, 95% CI 75-89%) were found to be significantly higher (P < 0.005) than that of F-FDG PET/CT (67%, 95% CI 53-80%). There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity of Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT and octreoscan-SPECT/CT (P = 0.161). Owing to the low number of articles with true negative findings, the pooled specificities were not calculated. A total of 287 tumors were identified in 287 patients according to the data the included studies offered. The majority of the tumors were located in the lower extremities (59.6%, 171/287), followed by craniofacial regions (24.0%, 69/287), torso (9.4%%, 27/287), and upper extremities (6.9%, 20/287).

conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that somatostatin receptor-based imaging modalities outperformed F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of TIO, with Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT performing slightly better than octreoscan-SPECT/CT.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansNeoplasms, Connective TissueOsteomalaciaParaneoplastic SyndromesSomatostatin1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- 1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acidFluorodeoxyglucose F18Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID32000173
PMCPMC7077972
OpenAlexW3003512583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.