Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31999919›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2020

Improved Consensus-Fragment Selection in Template-Assisted Prediction of Protein Structures with the UNRES Force Field in CASP13.

Agnieszka S Karczyńska, Karolina Ziȩba, Urszula Uciechowska, Magdalena A Mozolewska, Paweł Krupa, Emilia A Lubecka, Agnieszka G Lipska, Celina Sikorska, Sergey A Samsonov, Adam K Sieradzan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Agnieszka S KarczyńskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Karolina ZiȩbaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Urszula UciechowskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Magdalena A MozolewskaInstitute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Jana Kazimierza 5, Warsaw PL-02668, Poland.
Paweł KrupaInstitute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Aleja Lotników 32/46, Warsaw PL-02668, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9710-7837
Emilia A LubeckaInstitute of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 57, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Agnieszka G LipskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Celina SikorskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-166X
Sergey A SamsonovFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-4849
Adam K SieradzanFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2426-3644
Artur GiełdońFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Adam LiwoFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6942-2226
Rafał ŚlusarzFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Magdalena ŚlusarzFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.
Jooyoung LeeSchool of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4432-6163
Keehyoung JooCenter for Advanced Computation, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea.
Cezary CzaplewskiFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, Gdańsk 80-308, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-3403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The method for protein-structure prediction, which combines the physics-based coarse-grained UNRES force field with knowledge-based modeling, has been developed further and tested in the 13th Community Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13). The method implements restraints from the consensus fragments common to server models. In this work, the server models to derive fragments have been chosen on the basis of quality assessment; a fully automatic fragment-selection procedure has been introduced, and Dynamic Fragment Assembly pseudopotentials have been fully implemented. The Global Distance Test Score (GDT_TS), averaged over our "Model 1" predictions, increased by over 10 units with respect to CASP12 for the free-modeling category to reach 40.82. Our "Model 1" predictions ranked 20 and 14 for all and free-modeling targets, respectively (upper 20.2% and 14.3% of all models submitted to CASP13 in these categories, respectively), compared to 27 (upper 21.1%) and 24 (upper 18.9%) in CASP12, respectively. For oligomeric targets, the Interface Patch Similarity (IPS) and Interface Contact Similarity (ICS) averaged over our best oligomer models increased from 0.28 to 0.36 and from 12.4 to 17.8, respectively, from CASP12 to CASP13, and top-ranking models of 2 targets (H0968 and T0997o) were obtained (none in CASP12). The improvement of our method in CASP13 over CASP12 was ascribed to the combined effect of the overall enhancement of server-model quality, our success in selecting server models and fragments to derive restraints, and improvements of the restraint and potential-energy functions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsComputational BiologyConsensusModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID31999919
PMCPMC7588044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.