ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Codesigning COVID-19 booster promotion materials in online workshops with long-term care staff: a process evaluation.Health education research · 2026Trial
- Food insecurity in adults living with severe mental illness in Australia: an exploration of causes and experiences using a co-design approach.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- Improving Digital Measurement-Based Care Within Emerging Adult Mental Health Care Pathways: Protocol for a Co-Design Phase Embedded in a Multimethod Rapid Learning Health System Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Co-Designing a Fall Prevention Exercise Website to Meet Aged Care Community Needs.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
- The co-creation of Foot Selfie, a patient-centered mobile intervention to prevent diabetic foot ulcers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Facilitators' experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Addressing the social determinants of youth mental health in Newham and Northern Devon: reflections on co-design and systems change.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Continuity Is Essential: The Experiences of Co-Design Participants During the Implementation of a New Health Service.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- People Living With Dementia and Their Families as Educators for Social Justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Utilising co-design to develop a lived experience informed personal safety tool within a mental health community rehabilitation setting.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Authentic Online Co-Design: Partnership-Focussed Principles-Driven Online Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Reflections on co-producing an obesity-prevention toolkit for Islamic Religious Settings: a qualitative process evaluation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Article
- Development of an interdisciplinary training program about chronic pain management with a cognitive behavioural approach for healthcare professionals: part of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Experiences of participants in the co-design of a community-based health service for people with high healthcare service use.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Designing Implementation Strategies for a Digital Suicide Safety Planning Intervention in a Psychiatric Emergency Department: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Exploring stakeholders' experiences in co-creation initiatives for clinical nursing education: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCo-design involves stakeholders as design partners to ensure a better fit to user needs. Many benefits of involving stakeholders in design processes have been proposed; however, few studies have evaluated participants' experience of co-design in the development of educational interventions. As part of a larger study, health-care professionals, researchers and patients co-designed a collective leadership intervention for health-care teams. This study evaluated their experiences of the co-design process.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals (n = 10) who took part in the co-design workshops. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.
resultsFour key themes were identified from the data: (a) Managing expectations in an open-ended process; (b) Establishing a positive team climate; (c) Focusing on frustrations-challenging but informative; and (d) Achieving a genuine co-design partnership.
conclusionsThe development of a positive team climate is essential to the co-design process. Organizers should focus on building strong working relationships from the beginning to enable open discussion. Organizers of co-design should be conscious of establishing and maintaining a genuine partnership where participants are involved as equal partners and co-creators. This can be done through the continuous use of feedback to allow participants to influence the workshop directions, and through limiting researcher domination. Lastly, co-design can be daunting, but organizers can positively impact participants' experience by acknowledging the emergent nature of the process in order to reduce participant apprehension, thereby limiting the barriers to participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.